Jump to content

chrishickman81

Members
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chrishickman81

  1. I've been considering an ultra-wide lens for my N80 (and someday, D3 or similar

    FX digital body) and have come down to the following choices:

     

    AF 14mm f/2.8

    AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8

    (the new) AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8

     

    I'm leaning toward the 17-35, because I simply don't know that I will need to go

    down to 14 (or 15, or 16), plus it uses regular filters. It seems as though the

    14-24 is going to have better optics than the 14 and therefore would be the

    better choice (between the two) as it's not going to cost THAT much more...we're

    already talking about the most expensive lens I would own either way, so a few

    hundred here or there will not make a difference. My widest lens right now is

    the AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5 - 4.5, and I don't like to go down to 24 on that because

    of the distortion, but would love to be able to use that perspective and wider,

    especially in museums to "get everything in" without having to stand 50 ft away

    and having lower light capabilities (since flash is not usually allowed).

     

    Has anyone out there used a 14mm lens and can comment on the perspective it

    provides vs. 17mm?

  2. 17-35 AF-S f/2.8

    70-200 f/2.8 VR

    + the great Nikon primes - 28, 50, 85 f/1.4.

     

    To the oiriginal poster, I hope you're not doing any sort of sports because neither of the lenses you picked that have telephoto range are really suitable for that.

  3. My take is this - if you have to ask, get the 1.8.

     

    You know if you NEED f/1.4, and at 50mm. You probably don't (NEED, that is. Redeploy the savings for a trip to a place where you can take more photos, or buy more film with it to take more photos).

×
×
  • Create New...