gaby

I'm for raw! The quality is high and the colours are way better than jpg. The raw is the negative and you can start from that point. There's not much to change or to edit when you start from jpg. This is my opinion. I might be wrong.

You pointed very well! That's the question! Who are anonymus raters?

At the begining I didn't know, but then I began to make the things properly and YES I promise I'll review all the ratings and I'll explain. The point of this discussion is not me, is the system!

A decent site has rules! A decent site will require for any action to log in. Here is jungle... I'll think twice if I'll ever share my photos. Maybe I'm a 3 producer, but I want to know who rated me, I want to see his/her work-to learn.

1. Me and John Galyon are patrons of this site, so we deserve some respect. 2. Bruce Cahn is a very rude person and sincerely, I don't think that this site needs members who can't be nice with the others. 3. I just posted a question and the right thing to do would be to give it some thought. 4. My question, if it would be solved, would increase the level of this site. The fact is simple, people need words, not numbers. 5. Bruce Cahn is what? Someone who pretends to be good, someone who did all the things in life, but as his own cv shows, nothing good, because everything closed down. 6. Instead of ignore this user, maybe log in to add a critique or a rate would do better.

A and S are semi-auto modes and I don't use aurto iso, or ttl flash. Anyway, is an evolution from full auto. :-)

D50 and auto? Why did get that if you want to use auto? I work only in A and S and rarely M, but never in auto mode. It's hard, but you have to learn. You are missing a lot of fun... All the best!

1. I'm not a 3 producer. 2. I raised this problem because I saw many people complaining. 3. I do take lessons from a pro. 4. It says "request critique" and critique means words, not marks. 5. this photo.net, not expert.net . 6. Don't supraestimate yourself. 7. I didn't submit family pics or things like that. 8. If you are rude, maybe this is not the place for you.

I think that only the rate doesn't make any good. If someone doesn't explain

his/her rates, it remains just a rate. Nobody learns from rates. 7/7 without an

explanation is also just a shallow way of seeing things. I'm a begginer and I'd

like to learn. Opinions?

I have a 50mm f1.4 and it works great. It is good for low light, portraits... The image is great and it's sharp. I have in my portfolio a picture of my dog captured with it.

I have the 18-200 VR and the 70-300 VR. The fact is that 18-200 VR is good for almost all the situations. The 70-300 VR is for wild life, aerial shows or things like that. You can't walk around with it. I think that the good choice would be 18-200 VR.

Try to recover the data and then try to format the card. There are a few software programs that can do that. http://www.softwarepatch.com/software/smartrecovery.html

 

You will find the software you need. Good luck!

I have the Nikon 70-300 f/4.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR version and I'm very happy with it. It does a good job, but it's not the kind to walk around with it... It's for long distance photos.