digimage

<p>Dear to helpful advice , in puposure doing Wedding photography I currently had 24-105 L mm f/4 IS , 70-200mm 2.8 , 16-35mm f/2.8 working on 5D & 7D .<br>

thank you very much for all information advice . if I pick 24-70mm f/2.8 my 24-105mm lens going tobe useless it's right ?</p>

<p>Dear to mr.Bob Bernado , thank you very much helpful & respect all information from your experience . I would like to ask you how about low light due to 24-105mm shot during party or ceremony ? do they doing good if they are I'm going to likely consider pick 50mm 1.2 for my investment wedding shot . please feel free give me the best advice as you can , thank you</p>

<p>Hi to my photo.net budies photograph . I would like to asking for help please . Just lately I would like to do Wedding shot & some one advice me to have 24-70 L mm 2.8 then the other way I consider to 50mm L 1.2 beacause I had 24-105mm IS f4 . please tell me which one fit for me I use body 5D & 7D . WHAT good & more useful betwween 24-70 & 50mm . thank you very mcuh</p>

<p>dear to JW . in this case I had the same problem in CANON , one of my friend reffer me to do TEST CHART . let go to .

<p>

<p><a href="http://FocusTestChart.com">http://FocusTestChart.com</a> <br>

good luck & having fun .</p>

</p>

</p>

<p>90% I do manualy now . I'm not do wedding photo yet but I belived it's two part for them portait sutdio ceremony & social party . 90% manual for ceremony part it right but social party maybe not realy need just IMO . manualy is very powerful & realy taseting photography otherwise you're just enjoy 50% feeling how to love shooting picture</p>

<p>I'm agree to some one said 10-20mm perfect matching to 24-105mm that two lens very useful for travel , I don't have 10-20mm but my lens 16-35mm & 24-105 are favor lens for travel . the other thing I would like to say is crop factor to me THAT not a matter at all even I use them with 10 D , 5D , 1D mark II N . have fun</p>

<p>thanks to JDM . very appriciated your time your tip . so that mean no tint chart for sepia how ever you like it . thanks</p>

<p>thank JEFF and PETER</p>

<p>DEAR TO all who realy love to share about photography . lately I just start to love sepia tone in digital ( not film ) but I'm not sure how correctly SEPIA TONE look like . I did some but still in confuse please to share how ever you can I'm very appriciated , thank you have a good day</p><div></div>

<p>dear to all hobbie photographer PHOTOSHOP is power & fun some how useful & abuse . base at this topic for fun I would like to joy with my skill how ever good or bad please let me know , thank you for your opinion .<br />this picture I adjust them with perspective moved the subjecto closer screenplay then I terminated blue carpet not complement to flower& subject after that I apply blur filter to limit back groung leading viewer to the birdal . other thing like little contrast sharpen . the last important thing this file not RAW if they are maybe better adjust for fun , thank you</p><div></div>

<p>thank you very much to your answer , very helpful very technical & very complicated , please hopefuly I can have more answer if you can , thanks</p>

<p>untill now I'm not understand much about NOISE & GRAIN . TECHNICALY THEY ARE THE SAME OR NOT HOW TO PREVENT & IMPROVE THAT MATTER IN LOW LIGHT . thank you for concern & share out all information .</p>

<p>so sad in this case , very hard to solve this problem the only thing I wish software can has water mark can hide & canot remove by the owner . please to share this matter to you</p>

<p>the bottom price not base on equitment . if you base on 5D , D3 WHAT EVER THAT NOT RIGHT . In case customers looking for Photographer for weding day do they ask them to see their talen skill pictures to see OR do they ask them to see their equitment .</p>

<p>sorry I'm got propblem</p><div></div>

<p>here the picture before than after</p>

<p>hi June Daley .<br>

I would like to made better as I can but the 1st thing to considered THE MODEL has very pink pale skin tone as your shot with available lighting maybe out door shooting right ? the picture I working out w/ cs3 tecnical to use as :<br>

selective color , hue-saturation , history brush, blur surface,<br>

I don't adjust w any number just follow the color you want . which one should remove / remove some . which one should save /or get them back w/history brush . that your skill. hopefuly you will happy which some fun in digital photography . without PS you lose your fun</p>

 

<p>I think you don't need to buy marco lens , beacause like you expect in attactment picture & cheap lens ? you got it already why you need another ! but if you seriuos looking one but not cheap 100mm 2.8 canon it's marco </p>

<p>Hi Ben . 1D mark II N is workhorse camera I ever have and the lens most of the time I'm shoting was 24-105 perfect for travel treet life, portrait,lanscape beside that 16-35 mm L2.8 is wonderful for landscape favories only (my opinion ). between 10-22mm , 17-40mm , 24-70 I still pick 16-35mm but if you consider 35mm 1.4 I'll pick 14mm2.8L all that my favories lens for 1D mark II but if you pick 1Ds or 5D full frame that have a little problem vinegnt with 16-35mm 24- 105mm but it's easy to fix on photoshop . enjoy & good luck</p>

<p>I'm not tell you Canon or NIKON but you consider to change all system to one because HD VIDEO like you said . the best choice to buy HD CAMCORDER is better &cheaper and quarlity for video purpose or stilt image to print out</p>

<p>Hi there . my opinion realy simple I don't know much about color chart but I alway playing fun with COLECTIVE COLOR in photoshop some how if you want RED but not mean you have to adjust RED maybe blue/green or neutral depent on your file w/good white ballance so that mean I alway white ballance to the lighting I shot not on auto , some people said you can auto white ballance then adjust later on PS to me NO very diffenece when you shot w/right that time .</p><div></div>

<p>sorry I do some thing wrong than I can not post image in here</p>

<p>hi PATRICK LAVOIE . I think every tecnich it's their own look dependent on who looked it . I'm new & interesting about HDR almost 3months ago now I have some you can see please feel free tell me it's look natural or catoonist . thanks for any suggession .</p>

<p>please canon fan ! 70-200 mm IS L 2.8 and 24-105mm IS 4L are good choice to cover you expect . marco just for fun later .</p>

<p>with two set you point out ARE PERFECT FOR landscape trip the only thing I consider is FISHEYE IF YOU CAN ( the 2nd one is 800mm5.6 in case you turn around like to shot wildlife bald eagle in that erea ) wonderful planing trip good luck & joy.</p>