sunrisers
-
Posts
36 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by sunrisers
-
-
I bought one about 4 months ago and I love it. It's relatively short dollars but gives results as
good as the high end printers I have used. But as others have posted, ink is expensive (so are
they all) and replacing the eight cartidges runs over a $100 which seems to be enough for
15-20 Super B's. You can do the math!
-
Try the website for asmp.org for pricing software (search on pricing).
-
Dave is right. Plus shooting at a faster shutter speed increases the risk that you will have
banding issues
-
If you have created a mask, option click (Mac) (PC is alt clickI think) on the mask itself. Then
do a gaussian blur on the mask with whatever radius you want to feather.
-
I think it is both your light and your f stop. I agree, try f/11 but you might also need more
than a single mono which is what it looks like you used? A softbox up high, camera right,
may help.
-
I agree a ring flash. Or consider a second flash to use in a V position.
-
Save the money and buy glass
-
Sounds silly, but I had similar problems when I first got my Epson 1800. Eventually, it was
the paper I was using not matching the profile exactly and I'm pretty sure it was the premium
glossy paper too. Took me ages to figure out I had to download a new profile from the
Epson website (wasn't in the prepackaged profile bundles) and that solved my problem. But
you have an aweful lot of variables going on here (scanning, converting, etc) so maybe your
first step is to work with an image where you can predict the results better and then work
backwards. And try two or three different paper types (with the appropriate profiles set).
good luck
-
The reason RAW uses more space on your memory card is that you are recording a great deal
more data than does the JPEG function. So if you plan on using the data, it is always better to
shoot in RAW because you have more options when you come to processing, for instance
better resolution, bigger prints and so on. If you never need to have that capablity, JPEG is
certainly the easier way to go. But as they say: never say never. One day, that million dollar
shot may come your way. You can always convert RAW to JPEG, but you can never go from
JPEG to RAW.
-
There are a number of web hosting sites you can chooose from. Depending on what you
want to achieve, how many images you plan on uploading, what size, etc, etc and what you
are willing to pay will drive your decision. If you just want to share photo's for instance,
Yahoo might work for you. Then there are others a little more 'upscale' and expensive (like
photo.net) or collages.net (good for weddings), smugmug.com, ifp3.com. Most allow you to
'test drive' them for free for a few days. If you are a a MAC user, Iweb may also be an option.
good luck
-
Download "Bridge" from the Adobe site if you have not already installed it. You can also use
Canon's utilities that came with your camera but it is a real pain. Stay with RAW especially if
you are going to play with images in CS2..you will never get the same results with JPEG
because you loose so much data. Also, run out and get a book. The DAM book (digital asset
management) by Bruce Fraser is the one I use, but there are other great one out the too.
Good luck
Photoshop Actions - file naming systems
in The Digital Darkroom: Process, Technique & Printing
Posted