Jump to content

stefan_lindgren

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stefan_lindgren

  1. <p>For film-flange distance I would suggest you take a look at this page<br />http://home.earthlink.net/~eahoo/page8/lenses.html#top<br>

    In the 90mm table I found this:</p>

    <table border="2" align="center">

    <tbody>

    <tr>

    <td align="center">Schneider</td>

    <td align="center">Super Angulon</td>

    <td align="center">90</td>

    <td align="center">8.0</td>

    <td align="center">216</td>

    <td align="center">99</td>

    </tr>

    </tbody>

    </table>

    <p>The 99 figure is for film to flange distance.<br>

    More on the DIY 6x17 subject can be found here http://www.stockholmviews.com/diyphotogear/diy_6x17_camera.html<br>

    Regards/ Stefan</p>

  2. <p>Tip me and other site owners of how to increase traffic!<br>

    I run <a href="http://www.stockholmviews.com"><strong>stockholmviews.com</strong> </a> since 2008 and are now only reaching approx 400 visitors a day :0(</p>

    <ul>

    <li>I have a forum for DIY photography</li>

    <li>I have made some gear reviews</li>

    <li>There is also some nice DIY hardware (Both easy and advanced)</li>

    <li>I have a <a href="http://www.stockholmviews.com/links/"><strong>free links directory </strong> </a> feel free to post your URL there to!</li>

    <li>I also have a Blogg witch I occasionally use for news that I snap up,</li>

    <li>I use RSS feeds to post my updates on.</li>

    <li>And a xlm site-map to feed the search robots with.</li>

    <li>I also ask for help from other people with similar interests<br /> and have had some help from them to get more material to post.<br /> <br /> </li>

    </ul>

    <p>How can I improve it from where I am? <br /> (Except from improving my English, since I will always be a Swede :0)</p>

    <p>Regards/Stefan<br>

    <a href="http://www.stockholmviews.com"><img src="http://www.stockholmviews.com/stockholmviews-com-thumb.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="362" /> </a></p>

  3. <p>I reached my goal, I created a debate :0)<br /> And I was sure that I would hurt some feelings and get fingers pointed at my method and thoughts. <br /> But still, I do like the Digital better in most ways not only because it is convenient but also because<br /> it gives me much more alternatives to variate my slide show.<br /> <br /> In pure sharpness the good old slide projector is the winner but only if you enlarge the details in the way I<br /> did in my shoot out test.<br /> <br /> In the real world situation you would look at the image from a distance that would not reveal most of<br /> the faves in the digital projection, instead other thing like rich colors and overall appearance will make the<br /> digital image to look better for most people (Except for them who walk there way to the screen and examine <br /> the image at a 2 feet distance).<br>

    Just feeding the fire/ Stefan</p>

    <p> </p>

  4. <p>I just want to know what experience other photo.net readers have in regards<br /> of post processing for LCD projection in 1080P.<br /> <br /> During my "kind of" review or more correctly a<br /> <a href="http://www.stockholmviews.com/digital-projector-for-slideshows/index.html" target="_blank">comparing test of the Panasonic PT-AE3000 projector and a good old Leica P150 slide projector </a> <br /> but are still wondering if it would be possible to get an even higher quality image from the Panasonic <br /> by feeding it with better/other way of post processed files.<br /> <br /> In my head to head review I scaled all files to 1080px high and applied some but not excessive USM.<br /> I tested in several ways.<br /> </p>

    <ol>

    <li>'slide vs scanned slide in analog vs digital projection' and </li>

    <li>'Digital capture vs scanned slide in digital projection' </li>

    </ol>

    <p> <br /> Does anyone have a better suggestion/experience of post processing for projection in 1080p?<br /> Please let me and others take part of your thoughts and experience.<br /> <br /> Regards/Stefan <img src="http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/emoticons/smiley.gif" border="0" alt="" /> </p>

  5. <p>I'm just in the middle of a comparing test with a trusty old Leica P150 tt copmpete against <br /> a Panasonic PT-AE3000u digital projector.<br>

    I would love some feedback and maybe requests for particular tests and questions that might<br /> have crossed your mind regarding this subject.<br>

    Follow the head to head test here:<a href="http://www.stockholmviews.com/digital-projector-for-slideshows/index.html">http://www.stockholmviews.com/digital-projector-for-slideshows/index.html</a><br>

    <img src="http://www.stockholmviews.com/digital-projector-for-slideshows/images/panasonic-pt-ae3000-vs-leica-p150.jpg" alt="" width="621" height="163" /><br>

    Regards/ Stefan</p>

×
×
  • Create New...