Great shot - no problem aesthetically - but why down on "highly saturated" images? Grain in black & white vs. grain in color are like apples and oranges! I'm still a 'sprocket scientist' myself,
and I'm among the thrilled-to-death that Fuji brought Velvia 50 back in a new incarnation. No, "Disneycolor" is not for portraits, but
from mother nature to human-made still life I'll proudly swear by it until I can afford a DAMN good digital camera that can mimic it. I defend it the same way I defend "basic" black & white filter use: It effectively catches the eye of the viewer who could not behold the original scene with all five senses and is therefore justified in a compensatory manner.
Blair christmas
in Landscape
Posted
Great shot - no problem aesthetically - but why down on "highly saturated" images? Grain in black & white vs. grain in color are like apples and oranges! I'm still a 'sprocket scientist' myself,
and I'm among the thrilled-to-death that Fuji brought Velvia 50 back in a new incarnation. No, "Disneycolor" is not for portraits, but
from mother nature to human-made still life I'll proudly swear by it until I can afford a DAMN good digital camera that can mimic it. I defend it the same way I defend "basic" black & white filter use: It effectively catches the eye of the viewer who could not behold the original scene with all five senses and is therefore justified in a compensatory manner.