kentish_townie
-
Posts
73 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by kentish_townie
-
-
Thanks for all that info, Trevor. Greatly appreciated.
-
Mark,
Thanks for your clarifying comments. I look forward to the exhibition in London, sometime
next year.
-
Paul,
I've often wondered about just how sharp a lot of his prints were. I must confess, I haven't
seen them in the flesh, as it were. Mind you, I would suppose that, even if he wanted to
move up to medium format, or whatever, the diminutive size of his grant would have
probably prohibited it.
I thought it was interesting to note the contrast betweeen Ravilious and his working
methods have just seen Meyerowitz in action on the streets of New york in 'the Genius of
Photography'. The quietness of Ravilious's photographs seemed even greater.
I agree with you that VW or Purcell could have sounded too lush, too romantic but I still
have reservations about Part, in this particular instance.
By the way, you might be concerned about your eyesight but could you understand what
was being said by the locals? The Beeb should have supplied sub-titles.
-
I agree with David. It was an interesting and rather poignant programme. Following on
from 'the Genius of Photography', which I think is a really terrific series, it made Thursday
night essential viewing for photographers.
One minor quibble, given that the programme was about an English photographer working
in a disappearing English landscape, I can't help but think the programme makers missed
a trick by using Arvo Part (great though he is) for the background music. Maybe someone
like Vaughn Williams or Purcell would have been more appropriate or perhaps that would
have been too obvious?
Last night's 'the Genius of Photography' was on street photography (Eggleston, Frank, Parr,
Winogrand et al). It will be repeated, on Monday night, and I think it's worth seeking out.
-
Jinbo,
Where do you live? I don't think you should go for either of these two. There is an awful lot of
Leica equipment, out in the world. Can't you look somewhere else, further afield?
-
Hi Mark,
If you can put up with a 45mm lens, rather than a 50mm, I would happily recommend the
Zeiss Ikon Contessa. It's a neat, little, folding, coupled rangefinder with a very nice coated
Tessar lens. The focussing is easy and accurate and, so far (only had it a few weeks), I'm
happy with the results.
-
What about Robert White?
Also, Teamwork are a good source for Heliopan filters, which are every bit as good as B/W
but are considerably cheaper.
-
That's a tremendous photograph Trevor.
-
Henri,
Isn't the Heliar a Nikon rangefinder mount? I'm not expert on this, and will no doubt be
corrected if I'm wrong, but I don't think that this will work on your Leica.
-
It might be '75 Years of Leica Photography'.
-
For low light photography I find a tripod quite useful. Just a (very obvious) thought.
-
I thought Jessop's were about to go bust, or is it Dixon's?
Anyway, try Snappy Snaps. They are a lot more reasonable about processing and scannin.
Alternatively, of course, there is the M8. Decsions, decisions :)
-
If you're going to shoot at f8, or higher, then it would be quite cumbersome to use a Leica
lens, via an adaptor, on your Canon ( I it's a Canon you are using).
If you want wrinkles, what about medium or large format?
-
Hi Albert,
I understand that you can still buy the Kinoptik 75mm f2 new. It's a special order and it's
mind boggingly expensive.
-
"Unless you want to carry a tripod around th eworld, do not buy medium format, it's not good
hand held as it rattles a lot.."
Surely, not with something like a Mamya 6 or Mamiya 7 and their leaf shutters? Also, medium
format cameras have been known to be successful for portraiture, as well.
-
How 'bout the Mamiya 7? It's a medium format rangefinder with bitingly sharp lenses and it's
(relatively) light.
-
I agree with Neil, B is my preference.
-
-
Example, from a couple of years ago, of a 40mm Summicron.
-
Personally speaking, I always found it easier to find examples of bokeh, good or bad, in
medium or large format photos.
Vivek mentioned Cookes. This was taken on a 1920's 6x9 Thornton Pickard with a 5" f4.5
Cooke. Please excuse, the sentimental subject of the photo as it was only a test of camera
-
Trevor, what was it like? I thought the wretched thing was on next week.
I have to say, I didn't particularly enjoy the experience but Lee Lapthorne is a good mate so I
was only too help to him out.
-
-
Thanks, Vivek. The film was T-Max CN.
-
I have no idea why this picture is on its side. I hang my head in shame. Sorry, folks.
Sharp!? We don't need no stinkin' sharp!
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted
I don't have a problem with this image. I like it.
How does Ronald know what 'most' will, or will not, appreciate? Too presumptious by half.