dgfassett

<p>The industries greatest photographers did not haul around 11x14, 8x10, 5x7, or 4x5 cameras as well as the necessary truck load of support equipment only because they wanted more exercise. And why do you think that today's photographers must sell their first child to purchase digital LF digital equipment. The answer then, and the answer today is still, "bigger is better," almost always. It is understandable for a D300 guy or gal to boast about their equipments remarkable resolution and how much it cost. The boast is usually followed by the claim that it is "almost" as good ais film. Everything being equal, which everything never is, bigger is always better. But..... bigger is usually always a great deal more expensive, always more cumbersome, usually more limiting, and most importantly, usually requiring more knowledge and greater professionalism to master. </p>

<p><em> I have been using my 10-20 with my 200 for over a year and am very please with the results. I have always prefered using a wide angle as my primary and have not been disappointed.</em></p>

<p>Digital Imaging versus Photography. One represents an interpretation of reality, the other most usually represents a recording of reality. You have to be a photographer to understand the great difference.</p>

<p>You should strongly consider asking a friend to accompany you and to hold the second speedlight high and to the rear of the shot while it is extended on the stand. </p>

<p>Thanks for your input and response. However, which of the two, 800 or 900 would be the best bet? It seems that the 800 is a bit more costly.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>I am planning to purchase a second Nikon speedlight. I presently use the sb600 with my D200. What would the advantages of adding a sb800 or sb900 rather than an additional sb600?</p>

 

Same old camera, D200. Same old printer plus one new printer. Same Lightroom

and Capture NX both with latest ugrades. Same as the original system that

produced very good prints. Problem. NX prints a bit over exposed but within a

reasonable range for adjustment using either printer. Problem, Cannot get a

good print on either printer with Lightroom using new vista machine. Also,

what information is available regarding the ratings of differing printers that

would compensate for different printer characteristics.

Allright, no spell check. But at least you can ban the use of the word "Dude" or "Rocks."

A spell check option within Photoo.net couxld imporove many of the

submissssions.

Another factor is a camera setting on Program. By using aperture priority, you will be able to shoot wide open

I usually spend my time within the Nikon Forum and have noticed recently that

it appears that a large majority of visitors are not subscribers to Photo.net.

This lead me to wonder what the overall ratio is of subs to nonsubs. This

Forum may be an exception.

My d200 has never formated with the two button method. However, it formats using the menu process. Since this is not a big problem, and bad shots can be erased easily and quickly with the trash button, I never pursued it.

It would seem to me that with the investment you have made in all that equipment, perhaps you could have also scrapped togerther a few bucks to subscribe to Photo.net. It would also seem that that small investment here might have paid bigger dividends.

I suggest that is is not just an M8 that drives that remarkable feeling of holding a Leica. Damn! You don't even have to shoot one; the nearly silent, solid shutter, the balance, the class, there is nothing else like it. I have a 3F and an M4 which are not used much anymore for work, but are frequently just fondled for the simple pleasure of doing so.

Depemds on what you want to shoot. A single flashlight is capable of producing very attractive and interesting light in the proper circumstances. Two flashlights even more so in some situations. Or no additional light where there is some control over the subject and location. Photography is in part about recording on film or a sensor, what you see in your mind. Depends on what you want to shoot and what your mind saw!

APUG sounds like a great place to be. We all know that creating great digital images is much less difficult than doing the same in the Photography/film world.

Where can a person join this club apparently dedicated to the creation of non-

manipulated photography? Perhaps Photo.net might consider creating another

catagory exclusively for this art form.

After downloading about 200 of the 250 images from my D200, the transfer was aborted. In the D200 the card was identified as being empty. However, when placing the card in my HP photo printer's CF drive, the missing 50 images were identified and saved back to the computer. When in doubt, try all other options including a trip to your professional digital imaging headquarters.

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

<div></div>

Since it is the purpose of a polarizer to eliminate stray or reflected non polarized light, it is likely that a color shift may develop.

Shun:

Thanks! I used your link and 1.2 loaded with no problem. Ask and you shall receive...... at least on Photo.net.

I purchased Capture 1.0 at the same time I purchased my D200. Are follow-up

Capture NX upgrades provided free via internet downlaods from Nikon?