iliafarniev
-
Posts
3,927 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by iliafarniev
-
-
-
-
-
-
<p>At the moment exposure is completed. (-:</p>
<p>Another very imoprtant point is when you finely got it sold. May sound a bit rude for this delicate forum but true, nevertheless. And good place to go to from just about anywhere.</p>
-
<p>Take a look at from phylologic point, folks. Beautiful and Aesthetic are close but not semioticaly identical items. I think b. comes in English from French and originally signify a human personal quality and perhaps an animal grumming / pedegree - something from nobel trends. While a. is about constructions and design, say a building. In this sense a horse can be beautiful or not but a caw can not, yet architectural creation may be described as apropriatelly aesthetic or not. IWS b. works thorough emotional aspect and a. is mainly thorough the rational cons.</p>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<p>Exactly, Fred. I think one has to see the paramount purpose in personal creative endevours.</p>
-
<p>Yes. But the trouble is that human minds operate lexically (no pun intended). This basically brings us to the choise of presenting a photo to intelligent audience which unavoidably will make interpretations or present it to the unintelligent, so to say (which, hopefully, will make them more intelligent so they can ...) and so it goes. Lucky, we still have supra intelligent segment to challange.</p>
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
<p>Or Andy Warhol, for example. Was extremally modest guy though they had turned wig in him many times. This modesty thing IMO can actually be seen as a prefered strategy or an artistic technique or natural fear, for a change.</p>
Same but different
in No Words
Posted