Jump to content

stuart_ashall

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stuart_ashall

  1. Hi Simon,

     

    Not really is the answer. I've tried it with 24-105 and 17-40 same story.

     

    The point you make is a valid one - but again would you not expect more than one of the AF points to perform badly in low contrast / low light and not just the same one every time?

     

    Interesting what you say about the 50/1.4 - that's next on my list!

     

    Thank you very much for your input

    Stuart

  2. I have developed an auto focus problem with my Canon DSLR.

     

    I generally manually select the auto focus points. Recently I have noticed that

    one particular focus point when selected struggles to lock. To be exact it

    throws the image right out, hunts and then often fails to acquire.

     

    This only happens in situations of low contrast and in relatively low light.

    Now I know that AF will struggle in these conditions but the point is that in

    the same conditions every other focus point if placed over the exact same point

    in the frame will lock instantly without problem.

     

    Other things to mention...I have tested this at various distances (all outside

    of the closest focus distance), at differing focal lengths, apertures and the

    result is always the same: this one AF point has great difficulty compared to

    the rest.

     

    It is also the same result with different lenses so it is a problem with the

    body and not a lens.

     

    The AF point in question is the one nearest to 2 o clock if you know what I

    mean.

     

    I have heard that cleaning the contacts between lens and body (with a pencil

    eraser of all things!) may solve it but before I reach for my school pencil

    case or, as I am getting ready to do, send it back to the shop I wonder if

    anyone has any insight or ideas to offer.

     

     

    Thanks for your help,

    Stuart

  3. Hello everyone.

     

    On the back of some very useful advice on this forum I have, a matter of hours

    ago, bought a Canon 5d. Enthusiastic playing (sorry testing) was going very

    well. However I seem to have a problem - for some reason the AE lock indicator

    ("*") does not appear in the viewfinder to confirm AE lock in manual mode. It

    does in all of the other modes - just not in manual. Am I being galactically

    stupid here or is there something wrong with it?

     

    All responses very gratefully recieved.

     

    (Incidentally picture quality straight out of the tin is superb...)

     

    Thanks,

    Stuart

  4. Wow - what a difference a day makes!

     

    A sincere thank you to all who responded. I found the comments very helpful.

     

    For those suggesting the 16-35 I'm afraid I've already gone way beyond what the treasurer is comfortable with by opting for the 5d. One thing I've learned is that when you're on thin ice the last thing you do is start jumping up and down. There is no wiggle room in this budget.

     

    Given that I want the best lens I can afford now it's looking like the 17-40. Although I have taken the advice given on board and have both lenses on order at the local shop and will have a good look at them before making my final decision.

     

    One final point - what filters do people put in front of these lenses? Here I'm taking about gel filters such as Lee / Cokin. Are these systems wide enough for a 17mm UWA?

     

    Thanks again for the responses.

     

    Stuart

  5. This is my first post on this (or any) forum!

     

    I apologise if I'm repeating an earlier query but I can't see anything quite on

    this point...

     

    I have decided to go for a 5d. I have also decided to go for the "kit" lens 24-

    105L which looks like a great all rounder.

     

    I also would want a wider angle lens to take full advantage of the full frame

    sensor. Question is which one?

     

    My budget will not stretch to 16-35L. I don't want a fisheye.

     

    I'm really looking at these two:-

     

    1. 17-40L

    Pros - good build, sharp, same filter circ. as 24-105

    Cons - only getting 7mm wider for my ?500!

     

    2. Sigma 12-24 EX

    Pros - much wider, good build

    Cons - rear filter, where do I put my UV/polariser, heard its soft at the edges

     

    What should I go for or is there a lens I've missed?

     

    Any help or advice very gratefully recieved.

     

    Merry Christmas to you all,

     

    Stuart

×
×
  • Create New...