Jump to content

penmachine

Members
  • Posts

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by penmachine

  1. As mentioned, Quantaray is Ritz Camera's Sigma re-brand. I've had good luck with a

    couple of Quantaray zooms, one manual focus Nikon-mount 28-200 mm I bought in the

    early '80s and which was stolen in 1991; and a similar, autofocus 70-210 mm I bought in

    1995 for my F601 and still use on my D50. (It is better than the earlier lens.)

     

    For the money (quite low) they perform extremely well, and I would recommend them over

    the low-end lenses from Nikon (or, presumably, Canon, Olympus, Pentax, et. al.), which

    tend to have a price premium just for the name. The Quantaray/Sigmas, being consumer-

    grade, are not as good as the higher-end lenses from Nikon and the others, but you

    wouldn't expect that at the price anyway.

     

    I also second the recommendation for the Nikon 50 mm 1.8 fixed (non-zoom) lens. When I

    first got into photography, cameras came with 50 mm lenses instead of zooms, and I think

    that was a better idea because they work better in low light (wider apertures) and can be

    better built for low cost -- Nikon's 50/1.8 is especially outstanding, and extremely well

    priced. I would actually recommend that instead of a zoom, until you get a sense of which

    zooms might do you better. Keep in mind that a 50 mm lens is a mild telephoto on

    Nikon's digital SLRs, rather than a normal lens as it was on 35 mm Nikons, so you might

    need something else for wide-angle shots.

     

    But, compared to the low-end kit Nikkors, the Quantarays are nothing to sneeze at either.

    I just bought a 24mm Quantaray "Tech-10" (no idea what that designation means) from

    eBay, and we'll see how that does.

×
×
  • Create New...