dennis_porter

To answer Ken Simm. Your right about a painter and his brushes. But does the artist take a projector and project a picture on the canvas and then paint the picture. Photography is what one see's thru his eye's. Not to take the picture, then super impose it or manipulate it, with PS..Come on..These look like oil paintings than they do photographs..It is nice work though.

Good job Rarindra. You are such a pro when it comes to PHOTOSHOP. You do very well with manipulation. Try photographing scenes without the use of software.

This is a beautiful picture. Great colors. What I would like to know about digital. Can you size this print larger than 16x20 and still get the same detail. I have been shooting film for many years and have not been able to capture color like this. Very close though. But I would like to know if you could enlarge these prints, still get the same detail. Could I also get the same detail on film by going to a photo lab and having them detail the print like Josephine. All comments welcome..seymore4@cox.net.

I have been shooting photography since I was in the 8th grade. And that was just yesterday. I have had my darkroom for 9 years with alot of darkroom technics, burning in, cropping,etc. I have never been able to get a photo like Rarindra. I quit. I still to this day, choose film over digital. But after review of these photos, maybe I should switch to digital. But a photo should be, what one see's through the lens. Why are we using software and super imposing the photos. Rarindra photos look like oil paintings than they do photos. Please help me. Is choosing a 15,000 dollar canon mark 2 digital better these days than using my 4x5.