rapires

<p>I have both lenses, 110mm/f2.8 and 90mm/f3.5<br>

Most of time i use 90mm and i can´t see the quality difrence between both lenses, except 90m have more wider focal.<br>

Also i have 65mm and 180mm .</p>

<p>Hello Bob.</p>

<p>RZ67 PRO II have some improvments related to RZ67 PRO :<br>

- fine focusing<br>

- brighter viewfinder<br>

- improved AE meter (RZ67 also have a AE meter)<br>

- improved electronic<br>

And for shure you can have much more quality related to 645 Pro.</p>

<p>I have also both, RZ67 PROII and 645 AFD for more casual works.</p>

<p>I have the 645 Pro in the past and never have sharpness problems, the camera have a button to look mirror, because it´s a medium format mirror, a big one. The RZ series with the shutter in lenses, if you look mirror and due the camera wheight, you can produce so sharp images as a large format camera. Same for 645 series.</p>

<p>I use Mamiya RZ67PROII and Mamiya 645AFD in filed with no problems. Mamiya is cheap than Hasselbled and have very high quality lenses and bodys. The Z series lenses are the best i ever seen in optics. Shure is a heavy system to take with us for long walkings, but at 1 month ago i take my RZ with me in my backpack walking in Spain highlands in north with not much problem. Ansel Adams have sayed he take with him allways the most heavy camera he can carry :)</p>