mars c

<p>You can try the preference section that makes the software download the pix automatically , Or your card reader is busted.</p>

<p>I have both, I use the 17-55 2.8 more. There is nothing like having an straight f 2.8 zoom.</p>

<p>Yakim, Sorry that you got fired, This is life , It has ups and downs.</p>

<p>If it was me, I'd just take the 7d, 10-22, 17-55 and the 55-250. I suspect that 10-22 would be the most used lens on that trip.</p>

<p>Have a good trip, And take care.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>My Father's 18-200 also does that.</p>

<p>+1 with Bob, I don't see any lens , Except for the 50mm 1.8, That has not been improved in the latter version.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Send it to canon, I suspect a flexible wire inside snapped due to zooming action and old age, Causing the aperture mechanism to malfunction, Which then results in error 01 message on the lcd screen.</p>

<p>Happened to me on my 24-105. A common problem with these lenses.</p>

<p>Me too, They should also offer it on 550d/t2i, which I enjoy using.</p>

<p>In case you don't know yet.<br>

<a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_7d?pageKeyCode=prdAdvDetail&docId=0901e02480245968">http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/slr_cameras/eos_7d?pageKeyCode=prdAdvDetail&docId=0901e02480245968</a></p>

<p>double post, sorry</p>

<p>I highly recommend the efs 17 55 2.8 IS, It is a superb lens, Sharp and fast. I only got the lens recently, Makes me wonder why I had not bought it earlier.</p>

<p>Go for it !</p>

<p> Life is short, Just enjoy whatever lens you got.</p>

<p>Hi , I would like to express how pleased I am on the firmware 1.0.9. Before , I find the ALO unusable , The picture quality when ALO was used on the old firmware is ugly. But with the new firmware , The pictures are really nice . I highly recommend you to upgrade to this new firmware, It's worth it.<br>

I like it alot when canon have image quality related firmware update. 2 thumbs up for Canon.</p>

<p>http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/firm-e/eosdigital7/firmware.html</p>

<p>Oh wait, there is also a new firmware for the 7d.</p>

<p>http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/firm-e/eos7d/firmware.html</p>

<p>I am used to slow zoom with typical f number of 3.5 to 5.6, But when I tried the 17-55 2.8 IS, There was no going back, I then just bought one. A superb lens, It even makes my 24-105 4L lens , feel slow. ( No offense to other 24-105 owners :)</p>

<p>Hi Janice,</p>

<p>Th lcd panel itself is located behind a plastic glass , If the panel is broken , It would show black ink-like image even when the camera is not on.</p>

<p>But if the outer glass cracked it would be relatively easy to replace and you can find replacement on ebay.<br>

I already found one.<br>

http://cgi.ebay.com/CANON-EOS-REBEL-T1i-LCD-WINDOW-AND-TAPE-NEW-REPAIR-PART-/330464293084?pt=Digital_Camera_Accessories&hash=item4cf134f0dc</p>

<p>The 60d have fast AF, But when I tried BIF and sports with it, Set the af to ai servo and all af points activated, I feel that the 9 point Af is lacking. So during that time I was thinking of buying a 7d :).</p>

<p>Other than that, The 60d is a great camera on it's own, Especially when the need for the swivel screen arises.</p>

<p>Yes, In my experience it does increase the noise at any iso setting , shadows or not.</p>

<p>I just received a 17 55 IS yesterday and I'm very happy with it, I also have/had other standard zooms like the 24-105L, 17-85 IS, 18-55, 18-55 IS, 18-200 IS, and tamron 17-50 2.8 VC.</p>

<p>If I have to start from scratch again, I would only buy the 17-55 IS and the 18-200 IS for outdoor daylight use. All the others are just waste of money for me and some were sold already.</p>

<p>I would recommend a Hoya UV filter to protect your B+W filter.</p>

<p>The only concern I have about the 70 300 VC is that , The VC is not smooth and fast , There is an image wobble in the viewfinder when it kicks in, Resulting in blurred images when it coincides the shutter press.</p>

<p>+1 for the one shot mode.</p>

<p>The only problem remaining would be the AF speed, I have compared the VC version of that lens (which is known to be faster Afing than the non VC version) to the canon 17 55 is, The canon is faster.</p>

<p>Just buy a new one :)</p>

<p>My own experience with 18-55 IS is that it is sharp at close distance , But becomes considerably softer when being focused at infinity distance, Therefore, Not so good as a landscape lens. I have this theory that canon designed it that way , So that it will have good ratings when reviewed , But in real life use It is not as sharp as the reviews would tell you.</p>

<p>Unfortunately for you, $300- is way below the price range of good landscape lenses.</p>

<p>When Nikon finally does it, You'll still have to wait 3 years for the Canon version, LOL</p>

<p><em>Who needs a 60D?</em><br>

Probably people who are not Photo.net members<em>.<br /></em></p>

<p>I only use the WB/shift to neutralize the canon color rendition, So far I haven't used it as an alternative to tungsten WB, But I think it can be used that way. My guess is ,Shift it to blue.</p>