green1

Sorry ...the last 6 row are pasted for error.

I apologize!

bye

CALEB...

I'm not, of course, Richard Avedon, Ansel Adams, Nan Goldin or Annie Liebowitz (where am I really?...) but one of my shot can be same excellent....

Also we are not Richard Avedon, Ansel Adams, Nan Goldin or Annie Liebowitz that rate one of my (for example) photo...

The excellent rate must be sure rare...but there are not too much people that think be Richard Avedon, Ansel Adams, Nan Goldin or Annie Liebowitz and give of default 3/3?

:-)

You will never agree with many people's taste, because taste and aesthetics are complex, built upon years of study,experience and it always varies from person to person.

I for example went to art school, therefore I love to have content, but grew up looking at weston and love to have great composition lighting and understanding of the process as well. Others are satisfied with mere content, and others with mere aesthetics.

Sorry for the long post, I guess I think this is an important issue that many people fail to grasp...

There, that's my 35cents

I don't understand... There is someone that rate photos with 3 and 3 (minimum

rate) on any case?

I see very good shot with some rate 3/3.... but I consider these are honest

rates?

Tnks for your comments!