Jump to content

gl5

Members
  • Posts

    414
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by gl5

    Mind Eraser

          10
    this image is a tad too much in in the realm of digital manipulation for me. the over-coloring digital manipulation actually detracts from the image which in my opinion, it should never do. digital manipulations should never call attention to itself, in fact, if done well, it should go un-noticed.

    Untitled

          14
    i like the image and the cross-proccessing (try doing that with digital folks-no can do) but i think i would prefer this image if it was shot vertical instead. i find myself curous to see more of her body and the cropping off of her arms seems slightly odd.

    Patagonia

          6

    i disagree with the above comment that the reflection is distraction. i quite like it. it gives it a bit of an erie quality.

     

    also, you can immediately tell that this image is not 35mm or digital. the resolution and sharpness of medium format film is top notch and sure makes a difference!

     

    the only thing that might make the image better in my opinion would be to use a much slower shutter speed so that the water looks totally smooth a la Michael Kenna. I know this would be difficult to do in the daylight but perhaps a Neutral Density filter or slower than 400 ISO film would help that.

    thalys dreams

          12
    really nice and natural portrait. i would prefer it without the reflection added. her expression does not look like she is look at herself, but rather out into the distance. the photo becomes less pure the more digital manipulation you do.
×
×
  • Create New...