odama
-
Posts
435 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by odama
-
-
<p>I have both Fuji F30 and F100FS, still working with no problems. Looking at the first X100 images, I find it handsome. I want to have one in my hands for trial. I have a Leica X1 too, the fact the Fuji has a non collapsible lens is very nice, we don't loose time for a quick photo. I hope it will take crisp images and good high ISO perfomance.</p>
-
<p>Hi Ole,<br>
I think last version is the 2.6.3, I have it since July, 2009. It works with last 10.6.3 Mac Os Snow Leopard version I've on a Mac Pro. No problems, but I'm afraid to make next Mac Os upgrade. I Don't know prices.</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>Wide perspective of the tri-elmar 16-18-21 mm on M9:<br>
<a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/10915723&size=lg">http://www.photo.net/photo/10915723&size=lg</a></p>
-
<p>Mythological or not. Maybe one Leica news on next Photokina would be a D-Lux5 with the X1 sensor, or a X2 with a kind of D-Lux4 zoom lens, something like that. Nevertheless the actual X1 is a very nice camera, no hard feelings about its price...</p>
-
<p>To Les Berkley: Yes, You are right. I'm sorry, no much time to post or to put some photos on PN. Just coming from NY. You can see now some M9 taken on Travel theme I just add to my portfolio after your kind comments. Also one on Landscape I think. Hope you like them.</p>
-
<p>I don't know if more people feels the same as me about M9.<br>
Considering its price, I know M9 lacks many things other cameras have. Nevertheless I find M9 a very simple camera to use.That's why I use one, and it performs just as I need. Wonderful lenses and camera package. Just a simple camera without any odds and sods. That's it.</p>
-
<p>A 16-18-21 Tri-Elmar and a Summicron 35mm would be fine. Or a D-Lux 4 only, less weight, and a very nice compact to use in NY. </p>
-
<p>Maybe they are upgrading the site, since last thursday I couldn't access it.</p>
-
<p>Hi Rex,<br>
Hope to see more, but I found that you have a problem when loading your Alpa shots on this post. The images are more compressed on the horizontal dimension than they should be. What Alpa 12 model are you using?<br>
Kind regards,<br>
Jose</p>
<p> </p>
-
<p>I wonder if anyone on this forum has done some comparison between Alpa 12 and Arca-Swiss Rm3D...</p>
-
<p>I found the new M9 and X1 as visually appealing cameras. I want to buy the M9 next February-March, but one thing I've to say, I don't like the new M brochure photos (taken in Cuba), the sky is always burned and the colours aren't real.<br>
I'm used to my D-Lux4 and very happy with it. Hope I´ll be happy with the M9 too. Why did Leica show us those unrealistic photos on their new M brochure?</p>
-
<p>Under 200.00 dollars I'm not sure you find one. Maybe with 201.00 dollars...</p>
-
<p>I was a 64 addict...<br /><br /><a href="photo?photo_id=6438056&size=md"><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/6438056-lg.jpg" border="0" alt="Kodachrome 64... Epson 4990 scanning, 27 years later!" width="727" height="586" /></a></p>
-
<p>I think the alternative Hasselblad with some movements was the ArcBody. A very nice and expensive medium format camera (HBlad ended its production on 2002). When it was available, I liked a lot that camera with the 35 mm f4.5 Rodenstock Apo-Grandagon. But the SWC is still a great performer as we can see by that shot. Congrats Paul,<br>
Jose</p>
-
<p>Hi Ton,<br>
As I liked a lot shooting with my wife's D Lux3, now I've got the D Lux4, titanium coloured. I know price is higher than the black version, but when you look at the D Lux4 case prices, this coloured version has its own case included. And its a very nice compact camera.<br>
I bought it last friday, May 15, 2009. Hope to put a few images on my gallery soon. What drived my attention on it was the wider lens face to the D Lux3, a real improvement, I don't need a bigger zoom range.<br>
I'm not going to buy the viewfinder as I find it too expensive and obtrusive. My option will be the flash, have already ordered it.<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jose</p>
-
<p>Despite the current rebate on Hasselblad 's X1 and X5, I don't know if a Kodak iQSmart3 would be a better choice for you. Maybe someone has experience about those scanners, and can tell us more.</p>
-
When I bought that kind of lens, my personal choice was the Schneider Apo-Symmar L-120/5.6, and I'm very happy with it, I don't need to much camera movements. A bit wider than the 135 Sironar S, and similar lightweight lens too...
When I need a more wider perspective I use a Super-Angulon XL 72/5.6. That's all.
-
<p>Hi Martin,<br>
I don't know if you checked the Mamiya 7II:<br>
It's a very honest camera, you can take panoramic shots (as the Xpan) of course the Fuji has a bigger format, but it's also heavier than the Mamiya. That's one of my favourite itens to buy. It is a versatile camera, not so heavy, so you can go travel with one, without the weight & volume problem that you get with the View camera or Fuji 617.<br>
You should get one for trial. Just a thought.</p>
-
Wait for Koln Photokina. Maybe Leica will show us some new developments.
-
Hi Dirk,
I've the same doubts as you, but thanks I didn't bought a Hasselblad X1 or X5 (ex Imacon...).
See my previous post on
http://www.photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00MZ2P
Wish you good luck
-
I had the same problem and changed to a MacPro. My XP-64 comp just does net backups now. If I knew drivers problem before I'd continue to use my Windows XP 32, now thanks to XP 64 I own a Mac!
And no problems using it with PS CS3 and Lightroom.
-
I bought my S100FS on last April,10. Since that I use it most of time for casual photo and it's ok for me.
I really don't like to read manuals, I found it simple to use and putting my old Metz flash on it I get nice results for interior photos. That's what I think about the S100FS, considering its price it's a honest camera. I don't know why, sometimes the Metz doesn't start - then I start everything again, like Windows, but on most interior situations I use the external flash a lot and I get good results. I tried the S100FS flash but it's not enough. I find the ISO specs ok, no complaints about it.
The bigger sensor size compared to the ones used on most compact cameras, the film mode, the lens range, the price, that were the main reasons to get it. I could spend more money buying a DSLR, but I don't want (yet) to put the money on such cameras, the evolution is too fast... Maybe the new D700 or the 5D substitute... the specs are very nice. I still shoot 120 film for landscape when I have time...
I don't use the Fuji software, just ACDSee, Lightroom, CS3, iPhoto, whatever. I prefer to shoot ok than spend my time with computer software, just little crops, rotate, highlights, tonality adjustments on a very moderate scale.
-
Michael, I think Paul Butzi reported his trials with the Fujifilm Quickload NOT the Quickload II. With the II version I have no problems using the Readyload.
-
I wouldn't buy the X5 without taken a look on the IQSmart3 from Kodak or the Screen's Cezanne top flatbed scanners first. I think the prices are similar to the X5, and resolution is better.
LEICA M9 Grey Steel or Black
in Leica and Rangefinders
Posted