gooseff
-
Posts
31 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by gooseff
-
-
Thanks for the great responses. A few notes: 1) I got an email over the weekend that there was some trouble with about 250 uploaded images, this being one of them. So, to Amy, I appologize, but that complication was out of my hands. 2) I did use a Signh-Ray warming polarizer on this shot - hence the gradient in the sky.
-
How do you feel about this photo? Is the use of the sun shining
through the tree too much?
-
I too admire the picture. Great work. The caption is almost necessary in these times. It shows that you are serious about protecting your work. Distracting? Perhaps. But if anyone likes it enough, they could buy a print from you, right?
-
This photo was taken in the Dry Valleys of
href="http://snobear.colorado.edu/~gooseff/antarctic.htm">Antarctica
. It was earlyin the austral summer season and the sun was low enough in the sky to
be hidden behind mountains at certain times of the day. I think the
photo gets close to what I was going for - that is, diffuse sunlight
emerging from the rough ridge of 1882 (the unoriginal name of that
mountain). To me, the snow in the foreground shadow is a little
distracting, does anyone else feel this way, or am I just being too
critical?
Bare trees at dawn on the Colorado Plains.
in Nature
Posted
I was a little disappointed when I got this roll back and found that I
had not gotten what I think (now looking at the picture) would be the
best composition from this scene. It seems like the trees should be
farther to the left. What do you think?