Jump to content

j_woodson

Members
  • Posts

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by j_woodson

  1. because I do not know any better...but just what do photographers do with photos like this (street photography)? To me, and not trying to create an issue here, unless these photos have a special meaning to the ones in the photo or the photographer why take the shot?
  2. Jeff, I recently attended a wedding and used my old Rolleiflex 2.8 and Honeywell Stobonar (both 1960's vintage equipment). The pro using 35mm only, saw my equipment, complimented me and went about his business. I just stayed out of his way.

     

    However, he did one unique thing for formals. Immediately after the ceremony, the entire wedding party returned to the altar area. With many people remaining in the sanctuary the Pro sat down in the pew, off to the side while those that wanted to take their own photos posed people and snapped away.

     

    Meanwhile his assistant said so all could hear "In 5 minutes the formal photo session will begin, at that time the sanctuary will be closed to those not in the wedding party. Please take all the photos wish to, then step outside so we may finish. Thanks, we will see you at the reception shortly".

  3. with my Rolleflex 2.8E, both purchased by my father almost 40 years ago, then passed down to me. As mentioned above it "works very well once you get the settings where you are pleased (for fill flash)".

     

    Actually, I grew up using this equipment - learned the basics - and still shoot frequently with it.

  4. The rollei has the "B" setting for the shutter, but there is film in

    the camera currently so I can't experiment, nor can I recall if that

    setting can be locked in for a period of time. I will be trying for

    startrail shots while on a ranch in west Texas this weekend and would

    appreciate any input (regarding film, metering, and exposure length

    too if you're inclined). Thanks in advance!

  5. I am kind of on the trailing edge of the state of the art regarding newer equipment with an old Rolleiflex 2.8E and a Canon FTQL both left to me by my Dad. However, the difference in the prints are very visible. And yes, the 1.2 50mm lens for the Canon is very sharp indeed.

     

    The price of $25 for the 16x20 sounds really good as well, and you might not notice any difference with out a 35mm and a MF print side by side to compare. But in my experience, the MF photos always look much sharper and enlargement quality is superior too.

  6. It looked really clear and clean at the time, I just barely wiped it

    off, but I did not suspect a problem then. However, I will certainly

    look a lot closer at it,see if it looks changed in any way, finish

    the roll that's in it and report back.

     

    <p>

     

    Hope everyone will heed the advice ...it sounds like it is just not

    important to clean the mirror...just leave it alone or risk a problem.

     

    <p>

     

    Thanks

  7. I just read an older post here about mirror cleaning. Just a few days ago I did just that on my AE1 P with a tiny drop of cleaning fluid and lense cleaning cloth, very gently..didn't scrub. But now I'm worried I made a big mistake. I guess the only way to tell is to shoot some slide film and check the results...

     

    <p>

     

    What are the chances it's not really damaged...? If it is, how much $$ to replace?

     

    <p>

     

    Thanks

  8. Mike;

     

    <p>

     

    If I'm not too late here, I had the same dilema and just called Canon

    and asked for a manual. They charged me $7.00 for a photo copied

    manual and I received in about 2 weeks. Sorry I don't have the

    number, but I think I found it on their website.

  9. What are the chances....? Hope I haven't made a mistake by cleaning

    the mirror on my AE1P recently. Gently using a tiny drop of lens

    cleaning fluid and cleaning cloth it seemed to have cleaned up

    nicely, it really sparkled. I have not finished the roll of film

    that's in it yet, but will shortly...guess I will know then.

  10. I am considering accepting wedding and portrait opportunities, down the road, utilizing camera/equipment that has been in my family for years. This, of course, after gaining more experience with a Pro that I know.

     

    <p>

     

    Would any of you experienced pros do weddings with the following equipment?

     

    <p>

     

    AE1 Program

    28mm, 50mm 1.4, and 105mm Prime lenses

    Honeywell Strobonar 770 with battery(2)and A/C attachments

    Flash Bracket which positions the Strobe to the side

    FTb QL as a back up

    Gossen Pilot meter

     

    <p>

     

    Rolleiflex TLR 2.8E (for formals)

     

    <p>

     

    All is in fine working order, the Rollei is pristine, however I do not have an acceptable Tripod yet.

     

    <p>

     

    Or, would it be smarter to sell the FD equipment and buy an Elan 7 with a 28-105 3.5-4.5, using an old Rebel I own as a backup, buy a Stroboframe bracket and updated flash and start from there?

     

    <p>

     

    I am extremely familiar and comfortable with the manual set up, it's really all I know and grew up with. This was all willed to me by my Dad who was a very serious amateur photographer, tought me the basics and more, we even had a darkroom.

     

    <p>

     

    So, I'm just curious what you think......Thanks!!

  11. Recently I found a link on the internet for a source that will supply the 1.3v mercury batteries (about $5 a piece, I believe). I am curious if anyone has ever tried a source like that, if so, did it work out...?

     

    <p>

     

    Thanks

  12. Thanks for your anwers.

     

    <p>

     

    Actually the Strobonar mounts on a bracket that attaches to the

    camera connecting with a cable to fire it. There are not any contact

    points and I'm not sure what the voltage is. It works fine with my

    FTQL and my Rolleiflex, but just not sure about the AE 1 Program yet.

  13. The amount of credible information found here is terrific! I have learned so much more about my Rolleiflex 2.8E here and MF in general. Reading Photo.net has increased my interest and skills noticeably.

     

    Other sites do exist, however, Photo.net is easy, fast, accurate and not cluttered with ads. I look forward to visiting here as often as I can!

×
×
  • Create New...