daniel_ob

1. Yellow (or orange) line on right is too strong

2. line on right is to bright

3. some spot of pigment on upper part of asphalt must not be there

4. remove yellow line on right, move whole pic downward and add horizontal dark yellow on upper part of asphalt in the same way as vertical.

5. darken right hand part for it is distracting, but should be just a bumper to eye.

You got a point but some additional painting by you was required. All of that requires a lot of work. But it is photography. The idea is nice but still need a lot of work (not on screen).

Anyway good eye.

I think that original print is much stronger than croped one.

I would name the pic -a dancer-.

The clouds shape looks like dancing around, and the bold tree, lifeless, looks also as dancing in very elegant maner. Background is also lifeless, but tree in mid plane is full of life, leafs, and like all is dancing around that tree, while the backgroynd is a place for spectators. That is just short report what I see. Any crop I see as not very good think. even some leafs in hand of dancer (bold tree) can get nice meaning, as -I have for you something,....-

Tonal range is also very wide. As it is made by F3 Nikon it also prooves that 35 mm can make such nice print. What suprise me is such good print from Nikon 24 mm lens.

In all an excelent photograph.