mario2

<p>He estado leyendo tu post respecto a la falta de ideas nuevas o a ese punto de motivación necesario en cualquier actividad para progresar /disfrutar o estar satisfecho con el trabajo realizado y no hay nada más complicado que mantener el listón en lo más alto en cada especialidad y que además uno no acabe un poco digamos que “aburrido” con lo que hace, creo que a parte de amar ese tipo de fotografía es necesario indagar en que otro tipo de fotografía nos gusta o gustaría realizar e intentar entrar en ella trazándonos nuevos proyectos...nuevos sueños, pero claro eso no es nada fácil requiere un sobre esfuerzo considerable que ni todo el mundo es capaz de asumir o que tenga las ganas suficientes para cambiar, disculpa por el largo rollo…solo he querido dejar mi punto de vista a tu post…animo y a seguir que lo que he visto de tu galería es magnifico, aunque si decides cambiar a otro tipo de fotografía seguro que también lo bordarás… Saludos</p>

 

The subject is that the 28mm as you know is a 42mm (aps-c) and for architecture to capture entirely some

buildings is necesary to use a 20 -24mm ( in a full frame) also, when we want to solve some distorsion problems

(perspective), the PS invent information and increase the file a lot, for example: one Raw file convert to tiff

at 16 bits from my D200 ( 60-65 Mb) after editing wheigh: 100-120 Mb (the possibility that you need a new

computer with more power or increase your security hard disk in a future is real). The quality when we see at

100% an image decrease by this way is important to expend money in a good DC lens. Best regards

Nos ha dejado Alberto Conde, visceral, critico y entusiasta de la imagen donde los halla. Independientemente de nuestras diferencias, siempre te estare agradecido por haber sido ? mi padrino ? en Fotolibre . Descansa en paz

If it's a back or front focus,the D300 brings the possibility to look for by an acurate way the correct focus for some AF lenses,please see the chapter manual "configuration menu" ,Sorry by I don't have the manual in English.

Regards

Many thanks to all, to giving these information...I'm going to read the links.

Best regards

Many thanks for your review, I would like to know the real quality differences (level of noise and definition) between the D300 VS D200 (D300 at iso 200 and 100, D200 at 100 iso ).

Do you have any images cropped at 100% to see that points? Thanks in advance.

Best regards

See this pages in the D200 manual,chapter PRESET WHITE BALANCE:39,40,41,42.Best regards

Thanks to all, some answers help me to clarify some aspects. I�m aware that some important professional critics about �artistic world� don�t know to do: photos, food, writing, and musical composition�,although in my imho, doing a critique in some occasions, needs to held about knowledge and understanding of some important parameters, another point is if the image likes or doesn�t like.

I�m completely agree with Carlos Chavez, �At all, ratings looks like destinated to feed our egos � this can be good and bad�. In fact I don�t bother about if the ratings are very low, I prefer a bad comment about my photos ( if it helps me to learn) instead of receiving a low rating or a hypocrite comment.

Nothing better than a good constructive critic to awake us and get involved to evaluate my own job.

I agree too, that sometimes we need an opinion that encourages us; another important point for me into Photo net is the communicating with others, keeping cordial relations between us and exchanging opinions always with good manners.

About bad mannered critiques Neil said �we just have to accept them as part and parcel of Photo.net.� I agree to you Neil.

Reading again my old post, perhaps the image about my suggestion had, to a certain extend, a dramatic attitude.

I�m very keen on taking photos and ,for sure I�m learning a lot by viewing and reading good photographers works in this site. Greetings

Thanks for yours comments,in a few days I'm going to respond to all.

To all community of photographers

 

Hello I'm Mario;I'm a community member since 2005,I'm writting to you in order

to make some suggestions about diferent aspects that I observed concerning to:

Rates,bad-manered comments and the possibility of deleting a photo when being at

critique forum.

First of all,when talking about rates I dissagree with this point:some people

wants rate any photo must be affilied at photo.net,because if gives low rates

don't give the possibility to the photographer to defend himself by technical

means.why the raters are anonymous?is fair for members and for any people to

have the possibility to deffend.

Secondly,I have observed that some members give opinnions about photos in a bad

-mannered way and they have the "cheek" of not showing any photos at his

portfolio, this is uncceptable from a ethical point of view.

Finally, when a person put some image into "photo critique", the sys. shouldn't

allow the possibility to delete this image.In my case, I commented a image and

a few days later I realized that the photographer had erased this photo,my

comment and another ones.It was clear that my technical comment was adecuate and

accurate about technical aspects, don't know respect an opinnion, where is the

spirit of learning, this kind of web, give us the possibility to improve the

photography knowledges.

PD:I think that there is another important thing,the fact to preserve a good

ambience and cordiality,this is an essencial point between human relations.

I do hope you,consider my proposals and study the possibility of changing any

aspects related to all talked beforehand.Thanks in advace for your cooperation.

What do you think about this three questions?(this mail was send to photo.net

and I didn't received any notice)why?

Sincerely

Mario Lopez

I have been a bad experiencie about the dust on my sensor

First of all, Nikon don't assume any responsavility if you try to clean the sensor by yourself.The sensor cleaners avariables in the market,don't be homologates by Nikon, obiously their no earn money with cleaning.In fact to clean by yourself it, will be dangerous ,if you damage your sensor Nikon won't assume the cost of the repair, you must pay it.

Produce some damage on your sensor is more easier than do you think, I recomend to bring to Nikon dealer. aprox 25$

In anyway, if the quantity of the dust is not to much, you will use the software nikon capture (tool dust off) see the manual, to do a reference dust image. works well only whith a little quantity of dust.the final conclusion about the dust on a sensors is... don't change your lenses and buy other body. I understand... is expensive my solution..., but in any case is the fhoto a cheaper hobby?