sunny boaz

Hi,

 

I have all 3 items that you look for.

 

B87-QRFM; B87-SFM; FA-QR200.

Let me know if interested.

 

Thanks,

Sunny

 

 

 

FA-QR200

Hi,

I have sent you a PM. Please respond to the PM, if interested.

 

Thanks,

E-mail sent.

I have the following filters for sale. Make me an offer...

82mm Sigma Clear Ceramic Protector

82mm Hoya ND x64 Neutral Density

8mm Hoya NXT Circular Polarizer

82mm B&W XS Pro Clear "nano" protector

77mm B&W XS-Pro Clear MRC "nano" protector

77mm Hoya NXT Circular Polarizer

77mm Tiffen Ultra Clear

 

All are in excellent shape with no scratches, cross threads, etc. I just don't need them any more.

 

I sent a PM.

 

Thanks,

Sunny

$1,075.00 USD, Shipping is FREE within CONUS 48 States (Tracking number, and Signature required).

 

The following items are included with the COOLSCAN 8000:

#1: FH-869S 120/220 film strip holder

 

# 2: New glass (UNinstalled) for FH-869S to convert it to FH-869 GR.

 

# 3: FH-835S 35mm film strip holder

 

# 4: FH-835M 35mm mounted film holder

 

# 5: English Instruction Manual.

 

# 6: Power Cable.

 

In EX++ condition and in 100% working order.

 

Photos will be provided upon request.

 

Payment: Cashier's Check, USPS Money Order, a Personal Check, or Paypal (for a regular Paypal, please add 3% for fees)

 

Contact: sunnyboaz@gmail.com.

 

Thanks for looking.

<p>Originally I was thinking to use the converted lens on D2x exclusively with TC-16A that enables the Canon 400/4.5 to focus automatically in a limited range for BIF shots.<br>

I thought it was a cheaper way to emulate Canon EF 400/5.6 L on Canon DSLR body. Above all, the lens was a feather-light:-) So I could shoot BIF with easy maneuverings.<br>

With Nikon D2x (12M Pixel), and its APS-C sensor, converted 400/4.5 FD could hardly show CA.<br>

Thus it was a strange marriage but a good one, I guess.<br>

Then I used the same lens on Canon 5DII as a manual focusing glass. And its landscape shots were more than satisfied.<br>

That's how I have enjoyed thus far this underrated and hidden gem from old classic Canon FD lens group.<br>

Thanks for your inputs, folks!</p>

<p> </p>

<p>I have acquired a while ago a 400/4.5 FD- SSC that was converted to Nikon F-mount (Nikon F-AI mount).<br>

I used it on Nikon D2x mount and with an adapter (AF chipped) on Canon 5D II.<br>

Both IQ is not bad at all. In fact, very excellent.<br>

Anyone whth similar experiences?</p>

<p>Thank you in advance,</p>

<p>Sunny</p>

<p>Frank,<br>

Do you know a thing or two about calling him to get the ball cheaper than via ISARFOTO?<br>

Then, please tell us more about your experience with Rainer than just throwing at us his number!</p>

<p>Here is another excellent testimony with more photos by someone who has and uses this ballhead:<br>

http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6950</p>

<p>My experience with this German made low profile Ballhead is quite positive.<br>

Those who are into Nature, Widllife, and BIFs are well aware of the importance of the stable support of their gears.<br>

Unlike other famous Ballheads by the RRS, Kirk, and Markins, I find Burzynski Ballhead has a very low profile.</p>

<p>Thus Burzynski can provide you with a lot less chance of gear vibrations that is the main the culprit of blurred images.<br>

Its height is just 3 5/8"<br>

And its weight is about 1.11Lbs.</p>

<p>My Canon 600mm f4 IS (11 Lbs behemoth!) is behaving solid rock on Burzynski. Until I got Burzynski, I used Linhof Profi III that was a very stable one, nothing was wrong with it, but just its height was not my taste (-:</p>

<p>For Nikon 500mm P, Burzynski IS OVERKILL!<br>

So now you will see how rock solid this Ballhead can become to your support system out in the field.</p>

<p>If you are interested in getting this Burzynski Ballhead, I'd recommend to use NOT ISARFOTO (Distribuotr) IN GERMANY. You can order it from one of its affiliates in FRANCE!</p>

<p>From my own experience I saved at least US$100.00 by using French distributor than German distributor. Currently the German one charges you an exorbitant shipping fee at US 140.00.<br>

I am in no relation to the French Distributor in any ways. I just got a tremendous help from them for getting my Burzynski at cheaper price.</p>

<p>If you want further information about French Distributor, either you can find it from ISARFOTO website, or from me. Just send me an e-mail for the pertinent info. sunnyboaz at gmail dot com</p>

<p>p.s. (Michael H from Georgia, if you see this post, please return my item to me before too late).<br>

If you want to sell my Burzynski to anyone, it will become a criminal act, you know it better, don't you?</p><div></div>

<p>Shun's consistent bashing of other users of 35mm /1.8 G DX on FF body by his ABSOLUTELY SUBJECTIVE STANDARDS just baffles me. It's not like you Shun!<br>

Guys you don't have to defend apologetically what you do with your 35mm f/1.8 G.<br>

With all due respects Shun I've been reading lots of your wonderful posts, Shun, your last statement becomes now being an arrogant one, almost unbearable<br>

"...Why does it have to be AF-S and f1.8?" Are you kididing me, Shun?<br>

What? ALL IT DEPENDS ON THE INDIVIDUAL PHOTOGRAPHER OR PHOTO ARTIST's specific needs and wants!<br>

, so making me reply to this thread. FYI, I do have a 35mm F/1.8 G, but only for my faithful D2X.</p>

<p>Hi Noah,<br>

Well done, Noah! Your Mamiya 7 II did a fabulous job with 65mm and 50mm.<br>

I am glad you still stick with raising issues with alarmingly ever growing global squatters.<br>

I still have the Zeiss lens that you graciously sold to me quite a while ago.<br>

Wherever you go, just take care of your good health as well.</p>

<p>I do remember way back in 2007 Nikon itself began to use the number 2 Pronunciation when they began advertising to English speaking, and Non-English speaking countries including E.U outside Japan and Asia, until then it had been number 1, though.</p>

<p>I think D90 can last at least for a couple of years in your hand. You can get used to its ins and outs eventually, so you will be ready for a next upgrade to either FX or DX line with confidence in Nikon body in general.<br>

D80 has unreliable metering system. I do own it, and constantly adjust my Aperture not to blow up the high-lights. Do you want such a headache?<br>

If you feel comfortable with D80 and D90 in your hand, then I'd advise you not to get D200. I used to have it as my first DLSR from film SLRs. Yes, it's solid and fast also reliable, yet a bit heavy. So I'd like to stick with either D80 or D90 for that matter.</p>

 

<p>Erik,<br>

My wide lens experience started with Tokina 21-24 on my D200, later Nikkor 12-24, then Nikkor 17-35.<br>

I kept 17-35 now exclisively used it for the past 3 years in Hawaiin beaches for sun rise, and sunset shots.<br>

Just great for such landscapes. Clear and detailed scenes on full frame especially across the whole scenes. Of course, I used Nikon CPL filter (77mm: thin version) Tokina and Nikkor 12-24 were almost same, yet Tokina was a bit better controlled on Sunset flare than Nikkor 12-24.<br>

But 17-35 is even a lot better to shoot at Sun than Tokina 12-24 on D200 and Full frame bodies as well!<br>

Excellent flare control and no ghosting, or vignetting alone is worth keep 17-35 all the time for my aforementioned landscape shots.</p>

<p>Sunny</p>

<p> </p>