Jump to content

fc.moreira

Members
  • Posts

    163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fc.moreira

  1. I have a Nikon Coolscan V. It's a great machine considering every single aspect of the scanner. If you don't need a high level of automation, i.e., so many photograms at once for batch scanning, you won't notice any difference in quality with relation to the LS5000. The final quality is practically the same, except for Velvia chromes in the opinion of some purists. Concerning B&W, there's no dust and scratch removal for it. Just scan your monochromatic negatives as color positives and then convert them back after scanning, into B&W positives again. If you don't mind scanning every 6 negatives or positives or a single framed positive, don't pay double for the LS5000. The LS 50 (Coolscan V) is gonna make you happy. I do hope you enjoy it.
  2. Hi Tom! I have both Vuescan and Silverfast AI. After many experiences and time consuming, I have to admit that I've got my best results using the HP Premier software as a twain under Photoshop. Indeed it takes more time to scan and the interface is a bit cumbersome, but the results are the best. The trick is always to click in the 6 colors option, because it forces the ccd to pass twice on the transparency, lowering noise in the shadows and diminuishing the effects of clipped highlights. I've said before to keep away from HP software. What a big tongue I have. Pure precipitation. Here in Brazil, we use to say that the bird who sings too much, always pees in the nest..hehe. Sorry for this last statement, and have a good luck with the G4050.
  3. Hi Eyal. I have an HP G4050 and made some 4x5 scanning with it. Nothing wrong with the film holder. The copy came out perfect and sharp. I have Vuescan and Silverfast. Believe it or not, the best results, you'll get by using the original HP software (Premier) as a twain under Photoshop, despite the addicional time it gets. Always use the 6 colors option, because it forces the ccd to pass twice on the neg, diminuishing noise and grain effects in your copies. I am really amazed how such a low end and price machine like this one, can produce such marverlous copies. Even the 35mm negatives though little soft, are perfectly acceptables. If I can be of futher help, please feel free to ask. Good luck with your new toy.
  4. Hi All! Can anyone tell me if the Plustek 7200 is able to make a decent scan

    out of 35mm negative or transparency? I am not a professional, but not

    satisfied using a flatbed to scan 35mm film. I don't want to invest much money

    in a 35mm film scanner. Just wanna make decent copies of my 35mm material. Is

    this scanner capable of making sharp and resonable copies? Any other

    suggestions in the same category? Thnaks for your help.

  5. Dear Fiends, I have an HP G4050 flatbed wich I use to scan medium format

    transparencies in most, and eventually some 35mm also. As everyone knows,

    flatbeds doesn't make a perfect job on 35mm films. For this reason, I'm

    considering the possibility of buying a dedicated Nikon Coolscan V ED to scan

    35mm. Does the difference in the final result compensate the investiment for an

    enthusiast amateur like myself? I shall appreciate very much your opinion.

    Thank you very much

  6. Hi Tom,

    I have a G4050 also. Just run away from HP's software. It's not goog at all and makes the scnner even more slower than it originally is. I bought Vuescan, a U$ 49,00 aftermarket software and it is marvelous. The machine gains speed and you can use Multipass, a resource that eliminate noise in dark areas. Another better option, is to Buy Silverfast AI Studio, but it's a very expensive software, about U$ 395,00. Buy vuescan and you'll have a great surprise using it with the G4050. That'a what I am doing and getting marvelous results. Best regards.

  7. Hi Alberto. I have the G4050. Of course for U$ 170,00 We're not talking about a masterpiece. The main problem is its slowness to operate, mainly because HP's software bundle is not good at all. I bought an aftermarket software called Vuescan that makes this machine faster and more efficient. Indeed, it is better than I thought it was before buying it. The scanned material is of a decent quality, even printed ones. I've got surprised with its 35mm scanning quality for a low price scanner like this one. If you want something better, try Epson's 4990 or the 700, but they are much more expensive and they are flatbed also. Keep in mind that a very good flatbed scanner is very far in quality from a dedicated and expensive film scanner. With this in mind, and prepared to operate a slow machine, why to pay U$700,00 for an Epson flatbed? It's not the ideal solution in your case. Buy the G4050 for U$ 170,00, get reasonables results, and if once in a while you have some special job, send to the lab for a professional scanning. I hope my opinion had been useful in order to help you make a decision. Good luck!
  8. Hi Patrick! O.S. is Windows XP Professional. Software is Photoshop and Qimage. Inks are Sensient Formulabs corant for CIS in both printers. I've already tryied with Epson's genuine inks but didn't help. I don't use any profile. Windows and the printer's driver take care of it automatically. Paper is photo gloss. I do exactly with the same parameters with my Epson C88 (4 inks) and have no problems. I am quite sure that the R200 has a problem. I hope I've gave you all the information you need to give me some help if possible. Thank you very much.
  9. Hi Syed, I have an HP G4050 (half the price of an Epson 4990) and it makes a decent job with medium format chromes. I've scanned some 35mm chromes and negatives also, and after some post processing in PS, I get very reasonable prints. The only problem is that the G4050 is very slow and its bundle software isn't good. I use an aftermarket software called Vuescan, and the machine gets faster with it. For the price, U$ 175,00, it makes miracles. I am happy with mine.
  10. Hi everyone. I have a Epson R200 and the colors of my prints (photos) are not

    natural. There is a tendency for a green dominance in general. There's no

    clogged print head, I've asked the technician to change for a brand new one in

    the last service a week ago. I have also a C88 using Sensient Ink (CIS) like in

    the R200 and I don't have the same problem, i.e., the colors are natural like

    in the camera or in the desktop monitor. Can someone help me to correct this

    problem with the R200? Tks in advance for your kind help.

  11. Hi! I am inclined to buy a HP G4050, but the information in the HP's site is

    not very clear. Can someone tell me wich i s the maximum frame sizefor 120

    films? What about large format? Can I scan 4x5 or bigger negatives? What the

    Dmax of this scanner? Is a good one for film scanning? Tks in advance for your

    help.

  12. Hi!

    I am using a flatbed to scan MF negatives and positives. My scanner

    doen't accept the Silver Fast interface, therefore I use to scan with

    its twain drive in default mode and make color calibration and post

    processing with SilverFast HDR Studio after sacanning. I'd like to

    know if there is any difference in quality if I calibrate and correct

    the negatives prior to scanning with a scanner that accepts the Silver

    Fast interface during the scanning process.

    Tks for your help

×
×
  • Create New...