luis-a-guevara

November 1, 2008

Maybe If you do that I will be able to choose one of yours that can be improved by linear processing , if you care to make the RAW

file available to us . Maybe somebody else would like to do the same . There is no other way .

November 1, 2008

Just show your images.

November 1, 2008

By the way , Where are your images?

November 1, 2008

Cheaper than a free Program? Doubt it.

Frans .You are clearly in denial . You don't seem to take the time to digest what you read and , therefore you are stuck

in old technology . As one that knows what it feels to have the fingers wet in Pinacryptol ,developing film negatives by visual

inspection , in search for those elusive tones in the highlights , I welcome the technical advantage of doing that very

same thing with my "Digital Negatives" in both a quest for , both , improve my images , and second and inseparably

from the first one, express myself.

Too bad that you are not listening.

November 1, 2008

Please dont blame me for your failure to apply this process properly . The instructions , quoted here from my tutorial

posted earlier in this Thread , and from the first video , clearly say:

"SO , WHAT IS THIS LINEAR PROCESSING AGAIN?

Simple. I am sure that you will agree that is simple. Linear processing is avoiding the introduction of this Inverse

Gamma at the point where it hurts the most ,to reintroduce later, where it hurts the least ,as one of the last steps of the

Image Optimization , rather than at the Image Creation. A big substantial Difference.

Of course we must reintroduce it , to achieve again the necessary overall System Gamma of 1.0. If we don't , we will

end up with an image that possess the same Gamma as the display does , that is G2.2 , which for most people is VERY

DARK AND CONTRASTY and TOTALLY UNUSABLE. ( Please take a mental note of this , because when you process

Lineal Images and you forget to reintroduce the compensating Gamma of 0.45 , your image will be like that , dark and

concentrated at the lower tones.)"

If you dont get get it , nobody can take care of your inability . It might look like like a "new toy syndrome"..... for you ,

that are clearly disconected from what is going on , but Linear Processing has been around since the early 2000 ,

Canon has it ,as part of its RAW processing options , and so does Adobe in Lightroom and Camera RAW Converter. They might have a

good reason to be spending time and money in extra lines of code.

Linear processing is all over the place . Jonathan Wienke , in 2004 posted an excellent article on Hibrid Linear

processing, at Luminous Landscape here: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/hybrid-conversion.shtml, there is many others ,if

you care to do some Google research.

"When you point to the moon with your finger , the fool looks at the finger.. " Old saying.

October 31, 2008

This seems to be the root cause of so much disension . I hope it helps because I cannot keep up reacting individually to everybodys

posts:

Gamma by definition is the slope of a curve.The problem is that Curves , unlike Straight Lines ,do not have ONE Gamma Value that

defines them , they have an infinite number of them . One for each point along the curve , so to define a Gamma value for a CURVE the

Gamma of the Midpoint is used , because ,in the case of human vision we have better vision at the Mid Tones than we do at Highlights or

Shadows.

Because of this, Color Balance is also done at the Mid point , which ,on an image that has been Gamma Encoded ,corresponds

roughly

with its average midpoint in the Histogram .consequently COLOR BALANCE BECOMES OPTIMUM AT THE MID TONES AND

DETERIORATES TOWARDS THE WHITE AND BLACK POINTs . Dont confuse this whith White point , which is just the neutrality of the

whites.

For the same reason Tone Separation in GAMMA ENCODED images is LARGEST around THE MIDPOINT AND COMPRESSES

TOWARDS THE END POINTS. This gives posterization of the Highlights and Shadows .

LINEAR GAMMA , instead , is defined by a Straight Line of uniform, constant slope , so it does not introduce any compression of

tones , but leaves the tone distribution at the mercy of Binary numbers , that are strongly compressed at low Bits values and very spread

apart at the high bit values . The end result is excellent separation of the high tones with possible posterization of the low tones.

Neither of this processes is better per se , they are just tools in the toolbox of the resourceful artist . If your image has delicate

Highlights that you want to preserve or enhance ,then Linear processing will be your best tool , but if it is a dramatic low key image with

abundance of low tones , definitely Gamma encoded RAW processing is called for .

If your image has Both (HDR)Delicate , expresive highlights and interesting detail in the Shadows, then Double Processing ,

combining Linearly generated images to non linear ones is what it needs to be done.

<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/6548803-md.jpg" width="679" height="354" /> LUIS A GUEVARA

October 30, 2008

OK Franz lets try this other movie just for you :

<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/video.gif" width="70" height="70" /><a

href="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/Franz1.mov">Color Matching the 2 images , intro</a>

October 30, 2008

Excellent work Roger . Lightroom is my software of choice for managing my files and it does an excellent work indeed ,

but don't get confused , it is not Lightroom being better or ACR being worse , because Lightroom is based on ACR just

like Photoshop is. The difference is that you seem to know how to use it well. Your non lineal image is closer to my

Lineal one than what I got in Lightroom myself. Congratulations!

By the way your Liza and Adam's Wedding Gallery is the MOST PERFECTLY NEUTRAL COLOR BALANCED IMAGES

I HAVE EVER SEEN.!

Please don't miss the video I posted a bit earlier . Luis

October 30, 2008

Not that I know Mike . It is weird that each platform have advantages over the other one. The windows version has a lot

more control through all those Parameters , but the Mac version offers a more practical PSD output.

October 30, 2008

Franz , watch the movie please. Maybe the answers are already there.Luis

October 30, 2008

Hi Tim ,Mike and everybody . I did create a small Quick Time Movie , that I hope you will be able to see directly here

:

Please excuse all the deficiencies of it , but I am very tired.Here it goes:

<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/video.gif" width="70" height="70" /><a

href="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/Lineal%20process.mov">Lineal processing Video</a>

Hope you like it and that it helps.Luis

October 30, 2008

Hi Mike. It seems that you missed a link to an image showing the output preferences , here it goes again:

Welcome to this discussion . Luis

October 30, 2008

You have two dialog boxes shown in there . The bottom one is telling you that you have not selected a folder to receive the

output. That is strange because DCRAW-x will retain the last one used . the other dialog box is because this is an

application that originated as a Window /Lunix and in its Mac incarnation ,requires you to Drag the RAW File into the

specified place in the dialog box. It will not work by dragging a file on top of the application and that message will pop up.

Tim , I will try to make a Quick Time video showing the process from the beginning to the end.You are right about the

sRGB Gamma 2.2 . Typo.

October 30, 2008

...........Raw Developer is applying the default color profile because changing from it's default ICC version to

Extended Gamut slightly changed the preview even with Disable Processing checked which is suppose to turn off all color

management.................

..........Computer platforms and display calibration doesn't have anything to do with this since there was no physical editing

by eye of your image.........

.........But now that you indicated you've been using a Window's version with an "abundance of processing options" this is the

rub I've been looking for in this discussion...........

Tim , you are not making sense. You got confused somewhere. I do not use RAW DEVELOPER and I am not familiar

with its options. I use DCRAW-X that is, as its X in the name indicates , a Mac OSX only application that I use on my Mac

on OSX Leopard as I indicated previously. It is not sufficient to select a wider gamut profile , you have to CHANGE ITS

GAMA TO 1.0 as indicated at the beginning. If you dont , you'll remain at Gamma 1.8.

The "abundance of processing options of Windows version of DCRAW" (notice the absence of "X" ) was only posted for your

benefit, since you are interested on its inner workings, and is a screen shot picked up from the internet . I am more

interested in its PRACTICAL working and that will not work if you don't follow the recipe; first you do a lineal conversion to

16 Bit PSD in DCRAW-X , then in Photoshop you change the color settings for the file to a CUSTOM PROFILE OF GAMMA

1.0, then you do whatever you think is needed in terms of reinstating some of the things that the Linear Converter removed ,such as

SHARPENING etc., then Convert the file to sRGB ,and save it as JPG with an embedded sRGB profile.

Make sure that your Monitor is calibrated to sRGB standard of Gamma 1.8 ,White point D65.<div></div>

October 30, 2008

Tim , I dont know the inner workings of the Mac version of DCRAW , that is very elemental as interfaces go

,however the Windows version provides abundant processing options and information.

In case it helps you figure out the answer to your questions here is some info:

I have not been able to reach the developer of DCRAW-X , perhaps you have more luck and I have plenty of my

own questions for him , if you do.

I like the way you work. Very methodical and keeping good records. Your results are very interesting and look

close to my image , but they do look flatter , with less detail and tonality in the highlights and shadows

Your image :

My Image:

Again , it is very hard to compare images processed in different computers with different Displays and Display profiles. It is even harder ,

and perhaps futile to attempt to do so across the internet. My monitor is calibrated using Pantone Colorvision Spider hardware calibrator.

I have the original Profile and the Color Vision generated profiles and if I switch between them , I do see a difference, and I will

provide a link for a Q.T.Video that I made to illustrate this point. Luis

October 30, 2008

Luis version with no curves applied ( But converted to sRGB for Internet display)

October 29, 2008

Roger Smith , Oct 28, 2008; 09:24 p.m.

The image 30989.x3f looks like a very different image than the one you posted in this thread. Is that intentional? It also

appears to be somewhat blown out. I don't see this image anywhere in your photo.net or pbase or deviantart gallery to

compare your processing with mine.

Am I missing something?

Your images are very strong, by the way.

I'd really love the raw version of the image at the top of this thread to compare.

Roger like I said that image is already in my Fine Art Gallery so I decided to give everybody a chance to work on a

new image , before I presented you with my own rendering of it.

You are not missing anything , Lineal RAW images will enable you to utilize the FULL DYNAMIC RANGE that you

captured , so that gives you an extra Stop of room over the highlights that you can , and SHOULD capture by adding

extra exposure , unless you wanted them waisted as usual. So all my images have an intentional , lets call it

overexposure , of about 2/3 of a stop , because they are intended for Lineal processing.

From the point of view of Lineal Processing that is PROPER EXPOSURE , but if you process it normal it will look

overexposed because it is HITTING THE LIMITS OF THE CONVENTIONAL PROCESS.

Frans Waterlander , Oct 29, 2008; 12:21 a.m.

Luis,

I hate to rain on your parade, but something doesn't add up in your story. If as you say "linear processing

workflows compress the shadows and devote the rest of the Color Space to Midtones and highlights" then, if

further processing is applied correctly (meaning the finished image should show no changes in tonality and color as

compared to "normal" processing) ........

</blockquote>

DONT WORRY FRANS , YOUR POINTS ARE WELL TAKEN and they are indeed indicating that you are taking my

statements seriously and ,thinking hard

What happens here has to do with the fact that the order of things in the process DOES have an influence on the

outcome . I explain:

DEMOSAICING , or the creation of the 3 color channels. is done NOT FROM THE ORIGINAL CAPTURED DATA

but from DATA THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN ALTERED by GAMMA . It is from this , somewhat distorted Color

Channels that Color Balance will be determined. more so ALL THE SUBSEQUENT STEPS OF IMAGE CONVERSION

will build on this Gamma encoded Data , incrementing the deviation , since every step is modifying data that was

already modified by the previous step.

All Sensors will go through Interpolation of the 3 Color Channels , Anti Aliasing filtering , and , to counteract it, some

degree of Sharpening , followed by Contrast and Saturation enhancements , before finally compressing the data into the

chosen camera Color Space, as a RAW data file.

If you apply Gamma AFTER the Demosaicing and color balance have taken place you will have a very different result

because all this

additive deviations from the original data,will be acting on pristine data. If you remove Gamma and leave out

Compression and Color Space

you will achieve greater dynamic range with more highlight detail and richer color .

However, that's not what your examples show; they show dramatic differences in tonality and color; that's NOT

what linear processing should result in. Somewhere along the line you are introducing these dramatic changes in tonality

and colors and either a) that's unintended but needs to be resolved or b) you want that in addition to the linear

processing characteristics but then you would need to make that abundantly clear. As is stands right now, you are

causing changes you don't realize or you are not telling the whole story.

</blockquote>

On the contrary . Your statement reflects that you are taking Linearity as something that should be happening

between the final image and the initial image, and therefore because the RAW file I provided , as seen

through your processing looks very different to my final image you think it is not lineal , however the Linearity I

am interested on is in reference to the original Scene , the RAW file is just a means to an end. You cannot

possibly know the validity of this , because you never saw the scene. If we were just interested on being

faithfull to the way our RAW files look ,we will not be looking into this or any other process and we will be all happily

busy doing conversions the old way.

The confirmation of the advantages of lineal processing lies in the fact that you CANNOT arrive to the same rendering

of tones I made from that RAW file , unless you process it Linearly and Display it using a Lineal Prophoto Profile of

Gamma 1.0

....................this would result in less posterization/more detail in the midtones and highlights at the expense

of more posterization/less detail in the shadows.

This is an exellent point and very valid one . A 12 Bit Linear binary file of recorded intensity values will have 2048

levels available for the upper highlight stop , that if you can use it, (And you can if you use Linear processsing) will give

you a lot of tones for very delicate highligts with lots of detail and color nuances, but at the other end of a typical Six

stop Dinamic Range , you will only have 64 Tones to describe your shadows , leading to posterization and loss of detail

in the shadows.

That is why my opening statement was :

"Some images carry their message in their lower tones and some do it with their midlle tones and

highlights, like this one:

Normal RAW processing spreads the image tones evenly across its Dynamic Range , thus , abnormally

,compressing the highlights and expanding the Shadows , something that will not work well with this type of imagery

.

Linear processing workflows , instead ,compress the shadows and devote the rest of the Color Space to

Midtones and highlights making it the perfect Complement to this type of imagery ,that results from frontal

lighting."

Image IMG30989.X3F is another image carrying its message with its upper tones and therfore benfited in an

inimitable way from Lineal Processing:

<img name="" src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/for forum/IMG30989FinalCropped W logo .jpg"

width="1180" height="1150" alt="" />

</blockquote>

October 29, 2008

You haven't seen these artifacts?

Sorry those images were not converted using a linear process . But I will make it a point to develop those two in DCraw-X and

present the results a some point.

October 29, 2008

Hi again Tim .

Good work. I take it this was your tutorial you were planning on posting.

The only raw converter I have where I can actually get this dark linear unprocessed rendering is in Raw Developer (Mac

only). Its core algorithms were built upon DCRAW. I never thought of using RD's Unprocessed setting because I didn't know what

source profile to assign because I was with the understanding that digital sensors have no color space. I'm going to give it a try on one

of my own Pentax PEF's and see what I get.

</blockquote>

Thanks . The setting for conversion in ACR is buried as an option for SAVING as DNG ! While you are in the Conversion Screen ,

click "Save Image..." at the bottom and the "Save Options " will pop up.

Choose Format > Digital Negative andnew options will appear for DNG , that are "Embed Original

RAW" ,or "Convert to Linear Image"B , as you can see highlited in Yellow here:

Nobody knows exactly what they mean by "Lineal Image" since Adobe is very Cryptic about it. To me Lineal means not

only NO GAMMA , but no Compression , Sharpening ,Denoising ,

Antialiasing and no Interpolation, as well as no Vignetting or Chromatic corrections .

This is the only way that our color channels can be made from undisturbed data , meaning that it has been touched the least .

Ideally ,not touched at all.

I can't find a setting in ACR 3.7, the only version I have at the moment which came with CS2 that gives the same dark rendering as

Raw Developer.

Like I said I use DCRAW-X , a free Lineal Converter for MacIntel that does strip Gamma and Color profiles. You can download it for

free at <a href="http://www.frostyplace.com/dcraw/index.html">http://www.frostyplace.com/dcraw/index.html</a>

What peaks my interest in your process is the unusual and quite unique and beautiful color renderings in the images here

and in your gallery and was wondering if this is due to the linear process, dcRAW-X or the camera sensor RGB spectral response and

lens combo.

</blockquote>

Well , clearly, the image quality of the Foveon sensor ,paired to Leica or other German lenses , is much superior to unmodified

cameras or Bayer sensor, in terms of 3 Dimensionality and richness of color, and that is why I sell Converted cameras and Mount

Replacement kits at <a href="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com">Sigma Cum Laude</a> , but as your intuition is telling you

this Synergetic combination only comes alive with Linear processing .

However, what I don't understand about your images is why there are so many posterization artifacts along high contrast

edges and within tonal transitions in out of focus bokeh backgrounds.

</blockquote>

I have not seen any of this , but it could be that I am using a Color Managed Browser at a 24 Million Colors depth ,on Mac OSX

Leopard , with a Color calibrated 23inch Apple Cinema Monitor . Some of my images are very large , in the order of 900 mB , and when

compressed as JPEG do suffer a lot . Unfortunately there are no ways around that.However do look at your Display preferences to see

if you are in Millions or only in Southends. Many Mac models use main memory shared with the Monitor , so if you are low on it it might

automatically bring down the Display Resolution.

October 28, 2008

<h2>LINEAL RAW PROCESSING</

©LUIS A GUEVARA luis@sigmacumlaude.com

</h2>

This is one of the most elusive Digital Concepts , because ,when seen globally , all Digital Processing

Systems are Lineal. Otherwise the images we make will not make any sense to us.

We expect a Scene to look the same way whether we look at them through a window , through a Roof mounted

Video camera , at the Computer Screen or in a Print hanged in the wall . This would not be possible if their overall

processing systems did not respect all the tonal relationships of the Scene , such as color balance , Illumination

Dynamic Range , Contrast , Sharpness ,etc. When it does , we say that the system is Lineal and that there are no

distortions introduced by the process itself.

In practice our systems are lineal to a degree that we call "Realistic", and we recognize that some

combinations of Hardware and Software brands produce better "Image Quality" or that there is an

improved "Realism" in their resulting images.

Finally when dealing with this kind of elusive concepts , we can reach another plateau in the Image

Reproduction arena, that is referred to as "Three Dimensionality".

When the image quality achieved is so highly realistic we say that it has achieved "Three

Dimensionality" , that is ,it can fool the eye into believing that is real.

The European <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance" target="_blank">Renaissance</a> painters

refereed to this concept ,as "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trompe_l’oeil" target="_blank">Trompe-l'œil

</a>" (trick the eye")

<h3>So what do we mean by Lineal Processing as opposed to Lineal Systems?</h3>

Simple. Although as a whole all the elements of an Imaging System behave Linearly , their individual

Components are mostly Non Lineal , but their non linearity has been compensated at different points to achieve the

final desired overall System Linearity. The tool used to do this is called Gamma Encoding.

Gamma is nothing but the slope of a function graph that describe the relationship between the input and the

output of a system or a system element.

<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/LINEAL ROOT/gamma.gif" alt="Gamma" width="250" height="234" /

>The image shown is a Monitor Gamma Curve that is definetily non linear and non uniform

Gamma 1.0 , on the other hand ,means that the output divided by the input equals ONE. No transformation

takes place , and we call it LINEAL. The output equals the input.

We certainly want linearity in all our overall systems , be they music amplifiers or Digital Cameras .However in

Digital Imaging this is harder to achieve because our Computer Monitors , Cameras LCD Displays , and all Printing

Devices are Highly Non Lineal . Monitors for example have a Gamma of 2.5 and more, but our

Camera Sensors are very Lineal with a Gamma very close to 1.0 , so how do we conciliate this disparity ?

Simple , again , but largely unknown to most people, in spite that this has been with us since the creation of

Video Cameras :

<h4 class="style1"> An artificial Gamma Correction is introduced to the Captured RAW Data that is exactly the

inverse of the Display Gamma so that the overall effect is that they cancel each other out.</h4>

Since today imaging systems operate within Standardized Color Spaces , each one designed with its own

Target Display Gamma , of which the most ubiquitous is the sRGB Color Space that was designed to represent the

Gamma of the Average , Uncalibrated , PC CRT Monitor , of Gamma 2.2 , then the inverse of this 1/2.2=0.45 , is applied, as a transformation function, to the RAW data ,DURING ITS CONVERSION from

RAW DATA to Displayable Image File .

This is done in the RAW developer, as a first step , right before before any other necessary processes of the

conversion from data to image ,have taken place.The following graphic

illustrates how the two ,opposite curves combine , mathematically, to produce a Mean Value of 1.0 , the straight

Gray Line you see in between .

<img name="" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5a/Gamma06_600.png" width="529" height="479"

alt="" />

<a href="http://en..org/wiki/Gamma_wikipediacorrection" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Gamma_correction</a>

That is ,our RAW Data that was Linearly captured ,thanks to the painstaking efforts of the Sensor

Designers , is artificially DISTORTED when and where it hurts the most , right before Color Channels and Color

Balance are created from it.

The RAW file is just a Matrix of Data with no Color Channels , Color Spaces or even Color , for that matter.It is

not an image file. For more on RAW , please see my article "The Raw Story" at: <a href="http://

www.sigmacumlaude.com/The_Raw_Story.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/

The_Raw_Story.aspx</a>

<h3> SO , WHAT IS THIS LINEAR PROCESSING AGAIN? </h3>

Simple. I am sure that you will agree that is simple. Linear processing is avoiding the introduction of this Inverse

Gamma at the point where it hurts the most ,to reintroduce later, where it hurts the least ,as one of the last steps of

the Image Optimization , rather than at the Image Creation. A big substantial

Difference.

Of course we must reintroduce it , to achieve again the necessary overall System Gamma of 1.0. If we don't ,

we will end up with an image that possess the same Gamma as the display does , that is G2.2 , which for most

people is VERY DARK AND CONTRASTY and TOTALLY UNUSABLE. ( Please take a mental note of this ,

because when you process Lineal Images and you forget to reintroduce the compensating Gamma of 0.45 , your

image will be like that , dark and concentrated at the lower tones.)

For example , this is a RAW image , converted into a LINEAL Photoshop file,that was opened without

assigning it a Custom Lineal Profile. As you can see because is missing the Gamma encoding , the image looks

dark , because nothing is counteracting the Monitor Gamma.

As you can see its color settings are indicating sRGB , my preference as a Workspace for

those images that don't come with a Gamma Tag. SRGB has a Gamma of 2.2 , so we end up

with 2.2 + 2.2 = 4.4 , instead of the desired Gamma 1.0 . No wonder it looks so dark and Contrasted.

<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/LINEAL ROOT/CUSTOM PROFILE 1 STEP a.jpg" width="1049"

height="694" />

When I change it to Adobe Prophoto , that has a Gamma of only 1.8 , as seen here , the Colors get better , but theTones , although slightly brighter ,are still wrong and harsh .Detail is

poor in the HIGHLIGHTS and barely acceptable in the Mid Tones . But clearly we are moving in the right direction.</

p>

.<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/LINEAL ROOT/CUSTOM PROFILE STEP 3.jpg" width="1049"

height="694" />

NOW THIS IS THE SAME IMAGE , AFTER CHANGING THE PROFILE TO MY CUSTOM PROFILE , THAT I

HAVE NAMED AS "LINEAR PROPHOTO" As you can see here the Custom Profile is nothing but a

Prophoto RGB profile where the Gamma was changed to 1.0:

<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/LINEAL ROOT/CUSTOM PROFILE STEP 4.jpg" width="1049"

height="694" />

This a very impressive Visual difference , that comes from the fact that all instructions that the camera writes

to the Metadata of the RAW file have been stripped from it , by my LINEAL CONVERTER OF

CHOICE ,<a href="http://www.frostyplace.com/dcraw/index.html"> "DCRAW-X"</a>

This 16 Bit Photoshop PSD file was created, directly, in Adobe PROPHOTO RGB Color Space , without even

opening the image in a Viewer , so that I could quickly get to open it in Photoshop in the most Pristine condition

possible.

Some people do not believe this , so here you have a screen shot of the RAW file Metadata , as presented by

Photoshop CS4;

This is the Metadata of the Lineal PSD image .It is very short containing mostly creation information Please

notice how both Photoshop and Camera RAW frames are showing the File number IMG30989.psd :

<img src="http://www.sigmacumlaude.com/LINEAL ROOT/Pasted Graphic 1.gif" width="850" height="829" /></

p>

FOR COMPARISON , HERE IS THE EXTENSIVE METADATA FOR THE SAME IMAGE , THIS TIME AFTER

A NON LINEAL , ORDINARY <a href="..">A.C.R</a>. CONVERSION: ,

YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE ALL THE EXTRA INSTRUCTIONS , HIGHLIGHTED IN BOLD, and

the file number in RED

<?xpacket begin="" id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d"?>

<x:xmpmeta xmlns:x="adobe:ns:meta/" x:xmptk="Adobe XMP Core 4.2.2-c063 53.352624,

2008/07/30-18:05:41 ">

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:tiff="http://ns.adobe.com/tiff/1.0/">

<tiff:Make>SIGMA</tiff:Make>

<tiff:Model>SIGMA SD9</tiff:Model>

<tiff:XResolution>240/1</tiff:XResolution>

<tiff:YResolution>240/1</tiff:YResolution>

<tiff:ResolutionUnit>2</tiff:ResolutionUnit>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:exif="http://ns.adobe.com/exif/1.0/">

<exif:ExifVersion>0221</exif:ExifVersion>

<exif:ExposureTime>1/125</exif:ExposureTime>

<exif:ShutterSpeedValue>6965784/1000000</exif:ShutterSpeedValue>

<exif:FNumber>56/10</exif:FNumber>

<exif:ApertureValue>4970854/1000000</exif:ApertureValue>

<exif:ExposureProgram>3</exif:ExposureProgram>

<exif:DateTimeOriginal>2008-10-02T08:57:58-04:00</exif:DateTimeOriginal>

<exif:ExposureBiasValue>0/1</exif:ExposureBiasValue>

<exif:MaxApertureValue>0/1</exif:MaxApertureValue>

<exif:MeteringMode>5</exif:MeteringMode>

<exif:PixelXDimension>4096</exif:PixelXDimension>

<exif:PixelYDimension>2731</exif:PixelYDimension>

<exif:ISOSpeedRatings>

<rdf:Seq>

<rdf:li>200</rdf:li>

</rdf:Seq>

</exif:ISOSpeedRatings>

<exif:Flash rdf:parseType="Resource">

<exif:Fired>False</exif:Fired>

</exif:Flash>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/">

<xmp:ModifyDate>2008-10-02T12:56:29-04:00</xmp:ModifyDate>

<xmp:CreateDate>2008-10-02T08:57:58-04:00</xmp:CreateDate>

<xmp:CreatorTool>Adobe Photoshop Lightroom</xmp:CreatorTool>

<xmp:Label>Green</xmp:Label>

<xmp:Rating>5</xmp:Rating>

<xmp:MetadataDate>2008-10-02T12:56:29-04:00</xmp:MetadataDate>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:aux="http://ns.adobe.com/exif/1.0/aux/">

<aux:SerialNumber>01007372</aux:SerialNumber>

<aux:LensID>0</aux:LensID>

<aux:Firmware>1.4.0.1302 Release</aux:Firmware>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:xmpRights="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/rights/">

<xmpRights:Marked>True</xmpRights:Marked>

<xmpRights:UsageTerms>

<rdf:Alt>

<rdf:li xml:lang="x-default">ALL REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED </

rdf:li>

</rdf:Alt>

</xmpRights:UsageTerms>

<xmpRights:WebStatement>http://www.sigmacumlaude.com</xmpRights:WebStatement>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">

<dc:creator>

<rdf:Seq>

<rdf:li>LUIS A GUEVARA</rdf:li>

</rdf:Seq>

</dc:creator>

<dc:rights>

<rdf:Alt>

<rdf:li xml:lang="x-default">© LUIS A GUEVARA luis@sigmacumlaude.com</rdf:li>

</rdf:Alt>

</dc:rights>

<dc:subject>

<rdf:Bag>

<rdf:li>Tests of 19 and apo 2x</rdf:li>

<rdf:li>photar 25</rdf:li>

</rdf:Bag>

</dc:subject>

<dc:description>

<rdf:Alt>

<rdf:li xml:lang="x-default">19 f2.8 ELMARIT</rdf:li>

</rdf:Alt>

</dc:description>

<dc:format>image/tiff</dc:format>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:Iptc4xmpCore="http://iptc.org/std/Iptc4xmpCore/1.0/xmlns/">

<Iptc4xmpCore:CreatorContactInfo rdf:parseType="Resource">

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrExtadr>6337 NW 174 TERRACE</Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrExtadr>

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrCity>MIAMI</Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrCity>

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrRegion>FLORIDA </Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrRegion>

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrPcode>33015-4462</Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrPcode>

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrCtry>UNITED STATES</Iptc4xmpCore:CiAdrCtry>

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiTelWork>305 8269254</Iptc4xmpCore:CiTelWork>

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiEmailWork>luis@sigmacumlaude.com</Iptc4xmpCore:CiEmailWork>

<Iptc4xmpCore:CiUrlWork>http://www.sigmacumlaude.com</Iptc4xmpCore:CiUrlWork>

</Iptc4xmpCore:CreatorContactInfo>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:photoshop="http://ns.adobe.com/photoshop/1.0/">

<photoshop:AuthorsPosition>FINE ART PHOTOGRAPHER</

photoshop:AuthorsPosition>

<photoshop:SidecarForExtension>X3F</photoshop:SidecarForExtension>

<photoshop:ColorMode>3</photoshop:ColorMode>

<photoshop:ICCProfile>ProPhoto RGB</photoshop:ICCProfile>

</rdf:Description>

<rdf:Description rdf:about=""

xmlns:crs="http://ns.adobe.com/camera-raw-settings/1.0/">

<crs:RawFileName>IMG30989.X3F</crs:RawFileName>

<crs:Version>5.0</crs:Version>

<crs:WhiteBalance>Custom</crs:WhiteBalance>

<crs:Temperature>4700</crs:Temperature>

<crs:Tint>-1</crs:Tint>

<crs:Exposure>-0.95</crs:Exposure>

<crs:Shadows>6</crs:Shadows>

<crs:Brightness>+43</crs:Brightness>

<crs:Contrast>+25</crs:Contrast>

<crs:Saturation>+9</crs:Saturation>

<crs:Sharpness>25</crs:Sharpness>

<crs:LuminanceSmoothing>0</crs:LuminanceSmoothing>

<crs:ColorNoiseReduction>0</crs:ColorNoiseReduction>

<crs:ChromaticAberrationR>0</crs:ChromaticAberrationR>

<crs:ChromaticAberrationB>0</crs:ChromaticAberrationB>

<crs:VignetteAmount>0</crs:VignetteAmount>

<crs:ShadowTint>0</crs:ShadowTint>

<crs:RedHue>0</crs:RedHue>

<crs:RedSaturation>0</crs:RedSaturation>

<crs:GreenHue>0</crs:GreenHue>

<crs:GreenSaturation>0</crs:GreenSaturation>

<crs:BlueHue>0</crs:BlueHue>

<crs:BlueSaturation>0</crs:BlueSaturation>

<crs:FillLight>0</crs:FillLight>

<crs:Vibrance>+35</crs:Vibrance>

<crs:HighlightRecovery>89</crs:HighlightRecovery>

<crs:Clarity>+57</crs:Clarity>

<crs:Defringe>0</crs:Defringe>

<crs:HueAdjustmentRed>0</crs:HueAdjustmentRed>

<crs:HueAdjustmentOrange>0</crs:HueAdjustmentOrange>

<crs:HueAdjustmentYellow>0</crs:HueAdjustmentYellow>

<crs:HueAdjustmentGreen>0</crs:HueAdjustmentGreen>

<crs:HueAdjustmentAqua>0</crs:HueAdjustmentAqua>

<crs:HueAdjustmentBlue>0</crs:HueAdjustmentBlue>

<crs:HueAdjustmentPurple>0</crs:HueAdjustmentPurple>

<crs:HueAdjustmentMagenta>0</crs:HueAdjustmentMagenta>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentRed>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentRed>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentOrange>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentOrange>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentYellow>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentYellow>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentGreen>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentGreen>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentAqua>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentAqua>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentBlue>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentBlue>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentPurple>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentPurple>

<crs:SaturationAdjustmentMagenta>0</crs:SaturationAdjustmentMagenta>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentRed>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentRed>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentOrange>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentOrange>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentYellow>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentYellow>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentGreen>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentGreen>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentAqua>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentAqua>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentBlue>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentBlue>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentPurple>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentPurple>

<crs:LuminanceAdjustmentMagenta>0</crs:LuminanceAdjustmentMagenta>

<crs:SplitToningShadowHue>0</crs:SplitToningShadowHue>

<crs:SplitToningShadowSaturation>0</crs:SplitToningShadowSaturation>

<crs:SplitToningHighlightHue>0</crs:SplitToningHighlightHue>

<crs:SplitToningHighlightSaturation>0</crs:SplitToningHighlightSaturation>

<crs:SplitToningBalance>0</crs:SplitToningBalance>

<crs:ParametricShadows>0</crs:ParametricShadows>

<crs:ParametricDarks>0</crs:ParametricDarks>

<crs:ParametricLights>0</crs:ParametricLights>

<crs:ParametricHighlights>0</crs:ParametricHighlights>

<crs:ParametricShadowSplit>25</crs:ParametricShadowSplit>

<crs:ParametricMidtoneSplit>50</crs:ParametricMidtoneSplit>

<crs:ParametricHighlightSplit>75</crs:ParametricHighlightSplit>

<crs:SharpenRadius>+1.0</crs:SharpenRadius>

<crs:SharpenDetail>25</crs:SharpenDetail>

<crs:SharpenEdgeMasking>0</crs:SharpenEdgeMasking>

<crs:PostCropVignetteAmount>0</crs:PostCropVignetteAmount>

<crs:ConvertToGrayscale>False</crs:ConvertToGrayscale>

<crs:ToneCurveName>Medium Contrast</crs:ToneCurveName>

<crs:ToneCurve>

<rdf:Seq>

<rdf:li>0, 0</rdf:li>

<rdf:li>32, 22</rdf:li>

<rdf:li>64, 56</rdf:li>

<rdf:li>128, 128</rdf:li>

<rdf:li>192, 196</rdf:li>

<rdf:li>255, 255</rdf:li>

</rdf:Seq>

</crs:ToneCurve>

<crs:CameraProfile>Embedded</crs:CameraProfile>

<crs:CameraProfileDigest>1241CA94FDB2D3E6D897CD3E2908F5A3</crs:CameraProfileDigest>

<crs:HasSettings>True</crs:HasSettings>

<crs:HasCrop>False</crs:HasCrop>

<crs:AlreadyApplied>True</crs:AlreadyApplied>

</rdf:Description>

</rdf:RDF>

</x:xmpmeta>

<?xpacket end="w"?>

THIS SECOND METADATA EXAMPLE IS SO LONG THAT I COULDN'T MAKE A SCREEN SHOT OF IT AND

HAD TO COPY AND PASTE , INSTEAD.

So the point that I am trying to make is that when Utmost Image Quality matters , linear processing is the way

to go. Lineal Image Converters , like dcRAW-X and others , not only remove Gamma but also , Compression ,

Sharpening ,De noising , Anti aliasing and Interpolation. What you want is that your color channels are made from

data that has been touched the least . Ideally ,not touched at all.

All this , Compression , Sharpening ,De noising , Anti aliasing and Interpolation, can be best done tailored to the

image type, under the control of the Artist and not by invisible factory presets that only work for Generic ,Average

Scenes.

If you want to download the 7 MB IMG30989.X3F Zip file, to try all this by yourself , please <a href="http://

www.sigmacumlaude.com/LINEAL ROOT/IMG30989.X3F.zip">click here</a> , but please remember that all this

document is copyrighted.

October 27, 2008

Thanks Tim .

What versions of ACR can you get this linear output through its preferences?

I am not sure when was the first time that ACR included Lineal Output , but I have been using it at least for the last

Versions that started with Photoshop CS2.

Lightroom , as far as I know included the option since V1. But I dont generally use them , like I said I use a program

called dcRAW-X , that I know exactly what it does , being a Programmer myself ,while Adobe products are shielded in

Commercial Secrecy.

Was it the custom 1.0 gamma ProPhoto RGB which can be made using Photoshop's CustomRGB

within Color Settings?

Yes . You go Color Settings , select your desired profile , in this case Prophoto, and then go down to the Gamma

settings , that by default would be 2.2 and type in 1.0. Now Save this alongside all the other profiles with a convenient

name . Foe example I use "Linear Prophoto"

How was color temp/white balance applied?

The Header portion of every RAW image file, contains non user readable Metadata that includes a Sub-section

called "Exif " where all the camera settings in force at the time of the capture are stored . The RAW

converter reads this info and uses it to color balance the image. This particular Image was shot in the shade under a

Blue sky , illuminated by reflected light from the sky , so I had , correspondently set the camera Color Balance to

"Shadow" . As you can see the Non Lineal version shows the Yellow Bias imposed by the

"Shadow" setting , to counteract the Bluish illuminant.

The Lineal RAW image ,instead, does not have the Yellow color bias imposed on it , and therefore contains more

Blue , Truer to the Scene.

Did you apply further tweaks to contrast after assigning the 1.0 gamma profile to the bottom image

before posting it here?

Yes , of course . When you open a Lineal image and assign a Custom profile of Gamma 1.0 three things happen

:

1-You prevent Photoshop preferences settings for Untagged Images from taking effect ( This means assigning the

Users Workspace preference ,if exist , or P.S. default's , sRGB)

2-The colors of the Lineal Image now have a Context that defines the meaning of its color

values.

3-The Most Important Part. No Gamma transformations are applied to the tonal distribution , in essence passing it

right through , as it is , with its original Gamma 1.0

Because of this last part ( Which is at the heart of the reasons why you choose to do a Lineal Processing ) the

image will have a visual aspect that is Lineal , but with the uncompensated Monitor Gamma of 2.2 Riding on it skewing the

Midtones to the Left . (Remember Gamma is the slope of the Levels Curve at its Midpoint ). So Yes , you have to either

Reinstate the Gamma Encoding that you removed early in the Game ,where it hurt the most , or do a Manual

Tone Mapping ( This is better ) Either way you are doing it after the image have already been built from the maximum

data available , which is the point where any Tweaks will hurt the least.( All Tone Manipulations produce data Loss, so you want to

delay them until after the Image has already been created from the RAW Data into 3 RGB channels , on which the Color Balance will be

based upon )

This last part ,Tone Mapping , is something that every good artist would always do to every image , regardless of it

being Linear or Not , to account for each image needs, that are , obviously , different all the time.

The great benefit of this Lineal Processing is that it enables you to use all the Data captured ( Applying

Gamma different than 1.0 ,always shrinks the Tonal Range ) and because the High tones are up to this point ,untouched

, they can deliver a lot more detail ( Shrinking the upper tones means the tonal differences are minimized between

adjacent tones , therefore detail suffers) . This is a good thing because our eyes are less sensitive to detail in

bright lights .

At the end , when your are satisfied with your image , save it as a Master Image in PSD format , then convert it to

Adobe sRGB color space , change image to 8 Bit mode and save it again as JPEG with a

compression of 6 , for web display.

The end result is , like you said "A much better and more accurate looking rendering"

P.S. Roger I am creating a small tutorial using another , similar ,image of the same Scene , that will include a link to

download the RAW file .The other image is already part of <a href="http://www.photo.net/photos/Luis-A-Guevara">my Fine Art Gallery</a>

right here at photo.net . My RAW files are X3f files from a Sigma SD9 camera and Leica lenses , so you will have to

use either Lightroom or Photoshop to do the conversion.

More on this will follow soon.Luis

October 27, 2008

Thanks Tim .

What versions of ACR can you get this linear output through its preferences?

I am not sure when was the first time that ACR included Lineal Output , but I have been using it at least for the last

Versions that started with Photoshop CS2.

Lightroom , as far as I know included the option since V1. But I dont generally use them , like I said I use a program

called dcRAW-X , that I know exactly what it does , being a Programmer myself ,while Adobe products are shielded in

Commercial Secrecy.

Was it the custom 1.0 gamma ProPhoto RGB which can be made using Photoshop's CustomRGB

within Color Settings?

Yes . You go Color Settings , select your desired profile , in this case Prophoto, and then go down to the Gamma

settings , that by default would be 2.2 and type in 1.0. Now Save this alongside all the other profiles with a convenient

name . Foe example I use "Linear Prophoto"

How was color temp/white balance applied?

The Header portion of every RAW image file, contains non user readable Metadata that includes a Sub-section

called "Exif " where all the camera settings in force at the time of the capture are stored . The RAW

converter reads this info and uses it to color balance the image. This particular Image was shot in the shade under a

Blue sky , illuminated by reflected light from the sky , so I had , correspondently set the camera Color Balance to

"Shadow" . As you can see the Non Lineal version shows the Yellow Bias imposed by the

"Shadow" setting , to counteract the Bluish illuminant.

The Lineal RAW image ,instead, does not have the Yellow color bias imposed on it , and therefore contains more

Blue , Truer to the Scene.

Did you apply further tweaks to contrast after assigning the 1.0 gamma profile to the bottom image

before posting it here?

Yes , of course . When you open a Lineal image and assign a Custom profile of Gamma 1.0 three things happen

:

1-You prevent Photoshop preferences settings for Untagged Images from taking effect ( This means assigning the

Users Workspace preference ,if exist , or P.S. default's , sRGB)

2-The colors of the Lineal Image now have a Context that defines the meaning of its color

values.

3-The Most Important Part. No Gamma transformations are applied to the tonal distribution , in essence passing it

right through , as it is , with its original Gamma 1.0

Because of this last part ( Which is at the heart of the reasons why you choose to do a Lineal Processing ) the

image will have a visual aspect that is Lineal , but with the uncompensated Monitor Gamma of 2.2 Riding on it skewing the

Midtones to the Left . (Remember Gamma is the slope of the Levels Curve at its Midpoint ). So Yes , you have to either

Reinstate the Gamma Encoding that you removed early in the Game ,where it hurt the most , or do a Manual

Tone Mapping ( This is better ) Either way you are doing it after the image have already been built from the maximum

data available , which is the point where any Tweaks will hurt the least.( All Tone Manipulations produce data Loss, so you want to

delay them until after the Image has already been created from the RAW Data into 3 RGB channels , on which the Color Balance will be

based upon )

This last part ,Tone Mapping , is something that every good artist would always do to every image , regardless of it

being Linear or Not , to account for each image needs, that are , obviously , different all the time.

The great benefit of this Lineal Processing is that it enables you to use all the Data captured ( Applying

Gamma different than 1.0 ,always shrinks the Tonal Range ) and because the High tones are up to this point ,untouched

, they can deliver a lot more detail ( Shrinking the upper tones means the tonal differences are minimized between

adjacent tones , therefore detail suffers) . This is a good thing because our eyes are less sensitive to detail in

bright lights .

At the end , when your are satisfied with your image , save it as a Master Image in PSD format , then convert it to

Adobe sRGB color space , change image to 8 Bit mode and save it again as JPEG with a

compression of 6 , for web display.

The end result is , like you said "A much better and more accurate looking rendering"

P.S. Roger I am creating a small tutorial using another , similar ,image of the same Scene , that will include a link to

download the RAW file .The other image is already part of <a href="http://www.photo.net/photos/Luis-A-Guevara">my Fine Art Gallery</a>

right here at photo.net . My RAW files are X3f files from a Sigma SD9 camera and Leica lenses , so you will have to

use either Lightroom or Photoshop to do the conversion.

More on this will follow soon.Luis<div></div>

October 25, 2008

Good Idea . Here you have it one NON LINEAR RAW and the best one , at the end ,the LINEAR RAW:

IN THIS ONE THE TONES HAVE BEEN SPREAD EVENLY ACROSS THE HISTOGRAM BY THE GAMMA

FUNCTION

IN THIS OTHER ONE THE LINEAL RENDERING PUTS THE TONES AS THEY WHERE ON THE ORIGINAL

SCENE:

You tell me which one you like best, bost have the same "tweaking" except for the different Gammas</

P> Luis

October 25, 2008

Hi Frans . Those curves that you are refering to are really just describing the behavior of the Midtones of the

image, in fact the end points are fixed and your options are limited to defining the Slope of the curve at the Mid

Point , which as you described , by default is lineal , meaning no transformation takes place. However the Data that

you are trying to work on is already non lineal , since as soon as you open it in a RAW Converter , before it is even

separated into our familiar 3 RGB chanels , a Gamma of 0.45 is imposed on it, to counteract the Display Gamma of

2.2 , a very necessary step , since we expect the image to be ,overall ,a lineal representation of the Scene, in spite

that the Display is highly unlineal. If you choose a Midtone Curve of Lineal value , then all the intrinsic non linearity

of the converted RAW file is passed along untouched

What this means is that our RAW Data that was Linearly captured ,thanks to the painstaking efforts of the

Sensors Designers ,is artificially DISTORTED when it hurts the most , right before the Color Channels and the Color

Balance are created from it. The RAW file is just a Matrix of Data with no Color Channels , Color Spaces or even

Color , for that matter.

So what is LINEAR PROCESSING AGAIN?

Simple. I am sure that you will agree that is simple. Linear processing is removing the introduction of this

Inverse Gamma at the point where it hurts the most ,and reintroduce it as one of the last steps , where it hurts the

least.

You can do this in the Adobe products Lightroom and ACR , but only if you go deep into the advanced

preferences for conversion ,and choose LINEAL , instead of the default embed Original RAW file.

This is very different than the tweakings that you are talking about , since by removing the compression of

tones

introduced so early in the process you will have more tones to TWEAK .

So the point that I am trying to make is that when Utmost Image Quality matters , linear processing is the way

to go. Lineal Image Converters , like dcRAW-X and others , not only remove Gamma but also , Compression ,

Sharpening ,Denoising , Antialiasing and Interpolation. What you want is that your chanels are made from data that

has been touched the least . Ideally ,not touched at all. All this , Compression ,

Sharpening ,Denoising , Antialiasing and Interpolation, can be best done taylored to the

image type, under the control of the Artist and not by invisible factory presets that only work for Generic ,Average

Scenes.</

P>

Luis

October 25, 2008

Hi everybody . The SD15 is certainly attractive , since it promises to address the SD14 shortcomings, namely

some color bias and small Buffer , and in general , Slow Performance . But what Performance! .

Today there are choices of better lenses for it ,as you can see in the following images:

You just have to look around for it . A first place to start is <a href= "http:/www.sigmacumlaude.com"

rel="nofollow">http:/

www.sigmacumlaude.com</a> and also on

<a href= "http://shop.ebay.com/merchant/virtualcameraboutique_W0QQ_nkwZQQ_armrsZ1QQ_fromZQQ_mdoZ"

rel="nofollow">

ebay :</a></

P>

Sign In

Profiles

Forums

Blogs

Events

Downloads

Gallery

Store

Posts posted by luis-a-guevara