Its a confection, more a testimony to photoshop than to photography. Peter was partly right, but valorised the misrepresentation. Angel, how do you presume to speak on behalf of a dead person: who knows what Magritte would think of this confection? I don't. What privilege to a dead persons assessment do you claim?. The little I've read of Magritte seems to tell me that he was about the delusion of identity, an acolyte of post modernism.
No, this is a confection, and one of mixed metaphors for no purpose other than performance - there's a sunset, a walkway towards the sunset, apocryphal ending, and the obligatory columns along the way. A tired metaphor.
The chosen one
in Abstract
Posted
Its a confection, more a testimony to photoshop than to photography. Peter was partly right, but valorised the misrepresentation. Angel, how do you presume to speak on behalf of a dead person: who knows what Magritte would think of this confection? I don't. What privilege to a dead persons assessment do you claim?. The little I've read of Magritte seems to tell me that he was about the delusion of identity, an acolyte of post modernism.
No, this is a confection, and one of mixed metaphors for no purpose other than performance - there's a sunset, a walkway towards the sunset, apocryphal ending, and the obligatory columns along the way. A tired metaphor.
Give me a real photograph any time
Arthur McCulloch