Jump to content

skip hansen

Members
  • Posts

    255
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by skip hansen

  1. Since I have a bag-full of Canon EF lenses (for my 20D and EOS-3), I would be

    able to use them on my XL1 camcorder. Anyone have a line on a less-expensive

    adapter system? Evidently, it is quite costly? And, anyone have any experience

    with using something like this? There is a 7.2x conversion factor involved,

    so...it would help on the telephoto end, but certainly not on the wide-angle

    applications. Thank, Skip

  2. To Jim larson: "...snobbish hooey..." Nice touch! You finally hit on an accurate description of some of the...well, snobbish hooey you find here...and I do mean 'snobbish'.

     

    To Savas: I hope you are able to sort through all this...well, stuff. I use a Canon 20D right now. The on-board flash may help in well-lit, sunlight situations as a fill light. Use it indoors in low ligh and it makes your photos look like they came from a disposable camera (I think you can buy them for about $7.00). At 1600 ISO, (and an IS lens) a 20D (about $1300 or so) should suit your needs.

     

    I doubt anyone in a blind 'taste test' could tell the difference between a full sensor and no full sensor on any given print comparison. Wait...I here the snobs stirring again!

     

    Good luck.

  3. There is some useful info as well at this well-known filter site.

     

    http://www.singh-ray.com/index.html

     

    You'll find opinions all over the spectrum about on-camera filter use especially considering the things you can do with digital (ie, PS and other programs) RAW editing. The Singh Ray products may seem pricey compared to other screw-on filters, but they seem to be quite popular with working photogs, especially the Grad/ND filters for landscapes.

     

    Yes, find a good UV filter(s) for lens protection at the very least.

  4. You can get the same results from the little bulb thingy...a buck or so vesus $23.95 for that thing. Don't use the canned air, they usually contain an alcohol based propellant that you don't want on your sensor. If you change lenses at all, you are bound to get some dust on the sensor once in a while...fact of life. Blow it out on a regular basis with the bulb.
  5. Hey Swapan...take a pill! Why would anyone berate someone for asking an honest question? Why would you waste your time typing a response? It's a wonder why any newbies at all join in on these forums with responses like that! Get a life.
  6. Russ...just starting out in digital? Those lenses will most likely suit you just fine for now...I have owned both with my 20D and have since sold them and purchased several L series lenses that reach beyond those focal lengths. You have most focal lengths covered for what you stated your needs are. If you get into landscapes, you'll want something below 28mm...nature stuff: something bigger than 300mm. That inexpensive little 50mm f/1.8 is a nifty little thing to have (for portraits) as well though! Good luck.
  7. I agree...stick with B&H. Also, these so-called kits may not always give you anything near the extra value they purport. Just check the individual prices for lenses first. Some kits actually put L series lenses with them...make sure you're not paying a fortune extra for "junk" accessories not worth the extra money, ie, lenses cleaning kits, crappy tripods, etc. Good luck...welcome aboard the digital train. You can't go wrong with a 20D at this point in time...priced right around $1190. I have one and just upgraded to L lenses after a year or so with entry level stuff, most of which worked well for what I needed.
  8. Help! Today, I discovered a couple of small, dark, sharply defined

    specks in the middle of my viewfinder. They don't appear on any images

    and they are there with every lens in the same position. Like I said,

    they don't appear on images...I have cleaned the sensor, the

    viewfinder mirror, the eye piece, both ends of the lenses (although

    since they are there with every lens, that shouldn't matter anyway).

    Any suggestions? Thanks.

  9. My point is: the reviews and comments I have read included trying to get some sort of satisfaction from whence it was purchased, ie, "sent it back to us" (you pay shipping), etc. The main issues seemed to be that it didn't seat tightly on the 20D and didn't provide a stable platform from which to mount longer lenses specifically. Hope that makes it clearer. I plan on getting one anyway since it will provide the additional shutter button for rotated camera angles and a longer battery life. HS...I didn't mean to seem like a whiner! Looks like someone needs a nap...maybe another pill or something.
  10. The question should be: Why would you use a 4, 6 or 8 gb microdrive? They are fragile, they are a mechanical device, they are expensive. I would recommend staying with solid state CF cards (1gb or so). The likelihood of a micro drive going south is many times higher than a solid state CF card.

     

    Do you value your photos?

     

    I get about 75 shots of RAW, yes, RAW+Jpeg images on a 1 GB card. I wouldn't run the risk...so say most of the photography shop guys I have spoken with recently. It sounds cool (to have a huge micro drive), but it is not worth the risk.

  11. Being a new owner of my first IS (the new Canon 70-300mm, replacing my Sigma 70-300mm)...I have been very pleased with the results with my 20D. Basically, it can add greatly to focusing and exposure results. You should get about 2 to 3 extra stops of light with the IS, sharper pictures in hand-held situations and anything else involving motion (nature stuff for instance). I'm saving my lunch money for its bigger brother!
×
×
  • Create New...