mihail.ursu

For your feedback, I very much appreciate it. 

Thank you.

But why did you comment twice with the same words?

I am trying to remain in the field of documentary film making and photography but as time passes i find it harder and harder.

First, let me thank you for your time and knowledge. I've learned a lot from your posts and comments in the photo.net forum.

You are right, the room was dimly lit but there was a kind of cloth doorway which you can see at the www.noillusions.net site and then another cloth doorway to the exterior. I held one and the other one was open, so there was a streak of light coming from both and that was the light i used here.

I did have a flash on my camera and I thought about trying to fill the room a bit, but then decided it would look fake, also I didn't feel like I had the time to adjust it to look proper.

Regarding the light and how it affects the story behind the picture, it is very interesting because this was a discussion I had at my university today (i study cinematography) and honestly I do not know now how I could have done it differently, except with the flash, but I do understand that it looks fake even though it isn't and that is a flaw.

If you have any editing suggestions, please tell me. I am not good with post processing.

Thank you again.

a boy living with his 3 brothers in a temporary house while the house that

was destroyed by floods is being rebuilt.

thank you for looking and for any comments.

This is an OrwoChrom UT 18 slide film, expired in 1992, developed by it's own process

kit that is also expired in 1990 and made BW with CS 4 black/white using the auto

option.

Hussein Gurses, Fadi Tarawneh

I am glad you liked it. It is a Fuji Sensia 100 with very little post-processing.

Thank you for looking and for any comments :)

you who see my pictures are probably tired of that phrase :))