petre_petrov1

December 17, 2005

You've captured a great moment, and then you've almost ruined it by oversharping.

December 9, 2005

This is very close to what I think photography should do. It should make you halt and force you to question or change your vision. Is this expression beautiful? Awful? I don't know and I am not sure an answer is needed.

May 23, 2005

Opinions, suggestions, and critiques welcome.

April 17, 2005

Yes, yes! I love your sister and your portrait! Very sharp, austerely plain and evocative. Bravo!

(I don't understand who could have given this 3/3. It's an outrage!)

April 17, 2005

Opinions and critiques are welcome.

April 17, 2005

I like the scene and colors, but I am not sure about the star effect. Seems a little pushy.

April 2, 2005

Igor, this is your best shot. I can say this after carefully reviewing your entire portfolio. As usual, lighting and plasticity are just perfect. But here you have also incorporated in a stunning way an element external to the human body. I am sure Freud would have liked to have this image as an illustration of his work on female sexuality.

April 1, 2005

This girl is a terrific model, especially when shot in profile. This is not my favorite shot of her. You have used a short focal length and it shows. The nose stick out a little bit too much.

March 31, 2005

This is just the kind of stuff I like: bold, edgy, open to many readings and ready to show the finger to them all. Bravo!

March 25, 2005

Now, this is one classy macro. Very nice! The sky may be a bit overpolarized.

March 25, 2005

Oooh! I like this crop.

March 25, 2005

Classic composition. Very nice.

March 25, 2005

The lower part of the image could use a bit more detail, even if you have to blow off the sky.

March 25, 2005

Interesting angle. You should have probably cleaned those specks in the image.

March 25, 2005

The cliched image of silky flowing water is made not-so-cliched by the green that comes through the waves.

March 25, 2005

You've taken a great angle here, but the contrast in the scene is a bit low.

March 12, 2005

I shot this originally in color. Because the colors in the scene

were not particularly punchy, I thought it might look better in b&w.

Opinions and criticisms welcome.

March 12, 2005

Great angle on a picturesque subject!

February 23, 2005

Classic landscape with good foreground interest.

February 23, 2005

Moody, mysterious, enticing! I like it.

February 22, 2005

Among your photos, this one is my favorite. I wish the background was a bit more de-focused. Why such a deep field? Didn't you shoot this with a macro lens?

February 17, 2005

The distortion at the edges is very evident. I am not sure that this is a defect. The tilt of the houses on the left creates the impression of a cardboard world, something reminiscent of *Dr. Caligari* Did you intend this effect?

February 17, 2005

I like the idea and the framing (via the tree branch). I don't think that the lens' flare is working in your favor.

February 17, 2005

I was immediately drawn to it. The interplay of colors and surfaces is great. The shadow in the lower right corner is distracting. I would get rid of it.