ayn
-
Posts
275 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by ayn
-
-
I mailed mine in a while back and it's still in step 1 out 5 steps. hmm...
-
I use a combination of pricegrabber.com and resellerratings.com. I like Beach Camera, DigitalFotoClub, and B&H. for stuff that costs too much to ship I pick them up locally at Precision Camera.
-
If you are new to SLR/D-SLR's the 300D is just fine. Learn with what you have, and save the money for lens. I'd recommend only getting primes, L-zooms, and of course, L-primes. Don't bother with consumer-grade zooms (there are a few exceptions of course, but I think most would agree)...<p>
I got a 300D yesterday coz it has a $300 rebate while my 20D has none. I tested it out and was very impressed, especially for only $430! I definitely like the better design, construction, and extra features on my 20D, but for a beginner I am not sure if a 20D is worth almost $1k more.<p>
check out some <a href="http://gallery.andrewng.com/300D_Test">300D test pics</a>, I was busy so didn't have that much time, pics weren't my best, heh, but you can still tell the 300D is actually very good. I already shipped it to the buyer who's getting a great deal for it!
<p>
--Andrew
-
You can speed up the process by pre-qualifying your rebates at <a href="http://www.web-rebates.com/canon/">http://www.web-rebates.com/canon/</a>.
<p>
After you entered the UPC code, mailing address, name, etc, you can print out a page with a barcode on it. You mail that in instead of the rebate form.
<p>
Also, don't forget to cut out the name of the product on the top of the box!<p>I just sent mine in this morning! :)
-
I love my 24-70/2.8L, get it get it!
Not sure about the 300D (I have a 300D body waiting at my door right now, so I'll know soon), but with the excellent noise control at higher ISOs of my 20D, the 24-70/2.8L is great for available light shots indoor.
-
My .02:
Get the 20D, body only, and use the 50/1.8 until you can afford a new lens. With the 20D you will have to go for good consumer primes (50/1.4, 100/2.8, 85/1.8, and 50/1.8 is okay too), or L-zooms, and of course L-primes are even better. I don't recommend going with the 20D kit.
70-200/2.8L for $700 with scratches is NOT a good deal. I just got mine last Friday from Amazon, with all the rebates, kickback, and the Canon triple rebate, I am paying less than $800 brand new!
--Andrew
-
Thanks for all the replies, I have ordered the non-IS version of the 70-200. There is a
$150 Amazon cert offer for >$1k orders, after that, and the triple rebate, and my Amazon
Assoc kickback, it ended up being less than $800, can't beat that! :)
Me very happy, the lens should be here before the weekend. The 70-200/2.8L has been by
"dream lens" since I was in high school.
Thanks everyone for your suggestions! I didn't realize I don't really need IS until I read it
here, and $500 for something I would rarely used is a bit too much for me right now, so
decision was much easier. I would probably invest in a CF monopod.
-Andrew
-
Just looked at the EXIF info of your pic, you used a 20D as well, cool.
-
that is a cool picture, Steven.
A few questions:
Do you also have a 1.6x crop factor camera?
Do you find the lens too obnoxiously huge, especially with the hood on? Or does it feel
just right in your hands?
-
wow, those are amazing portraits, very very nice!
I really want this lens, too bad it doesn't have the triple rebate, otherwise I'd get it for sure.
hmm... still very tempting...
-Andrew
-
Hi all, first post here. I currently have a 24-70/2.8L on my 20D, the 24-70 is my only lens
right now as I've sold all my non-L zooms from my 35mm days.
I photograph people mostly; portraits, glamour, fashion, art nudes, etc. My other hobby is
track so occasionally I'd like to photograph cars at the track when I volunteer as a corner
worker, but I don't do that very often.
I am looking at getting a new lens to take advantage of the triple rebate offers. I'd love to
have the 85/1.2L, but there is no rebate on that lens right now. I might also consider the
100/2.8 Macro.
I've always wanted the 70-200/2.8L IS, but for one, it's a bit expensive, and with my crop
factor I'm not sure how useful it'd be for portraits. The 135/2L seems nice, I can get a 1.4x
if I need a longer lens for track, and the 135/2L + 1.4x will still be less expensive than the
70-200/2.8L IS. But I might need the 70-135 range for some of my work. So I'm kindda
torn between these 2 lens. Any advice would be highly appreciated!
5D Mark II Flash Sync Speed
in Canon EOS Mount
Posted