Jump to content

ayn

Members
  • Posts

    275
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ayn

  1. <p>I sync at 1/200 with PWs and Alien Bees and have no problems. On my 20D I sync at 1/250. But I've only done one shoot in the studio with my 5D2 as I've only had it for 3 days. Will pay more attention to this when I shoot tonight and tomorrow, though, a curtain is pretty damn obvious when I see one. :)</p>
  2. If you are new to SLR/D-SLR's the 300D is just fine. Learn with what you have, and save the money for lens. I'd recommend only getting primes, L-zooms, and of course, L-primes. Don't bother with consumer-grade zooms (there are a few exceptions of course, but I think most would agree)...<p>

    I got a 300D yesterday coz it has a $300 rebate while my 20D has none. I tested it out and was very impressed, especially for only $430! I definitely like the better design, construction, and extra features on my 20D, but for a beginner I am not sure if a 20D is worth almost $1k more.<p>

     

    check out some <a href="http://gallery.andrewng.com/300D_Test">300D test pics</a>, I was busy so didn't have that much time, pics weren't my best, heh, but you can still tell the 300D is actually very good. I already shipped it to the buyer who's getting a great deal for it!

    <p>

    --Andrew

  3. My .02:

     

    Get the 20D, body only, and use the 50/1.8 until you can afford a new lens. With the 20D you will have to go for good consumer primes (50/1.4, 100/2.8, 85/1.8, and 50/1.8 is okay too), or L-zooms, and of course L-primes are even better. I don't recommend going with the 20D kit.

     

    70-200/2.8L for $700 with scratches is NOT a good deal. I just got mine last Friday from Amazon, with all the rebates, kickback, and the Canon triple rebate, I am paying less than $800 brand new!

     

    --Andrew

  4. Thanks for all the replies, I have ordered the non-IS version of the 70-200. There is a

    $150 Amazon cert offer for >$1k orders, after that, and the triple rebate, and my Amazon

    Assoc kickback, it ended up being less than $800, can't beat that! :)

     

    Me very happy, the lens should be here before the weekend. The 70-200/2.8L has been by

    "dream lens" since I was in high school.

     

    Thanks everyone for your suggestions! I didn't realize I don't really need IS until I read it

    here, and $500 for something I would rarely used is a bit too much for me right now, so

    decision was much easier. I would probably invest in a CF monopod.

     

    -Andrew

  5. Hi all, first post here. I currently have a 24-70/2.8L on my 20D, the 24-70 is my only lens

    right now as I've sold all my non-L zooms from my 35mm days.

     

    I photograph people mostly; portraits, glamour, fashion, art nudes, etc. My other hobby is

    track so occasionally I'd like to photograph cars at the track when I volunteer as a corner

    worker, but I don't do that very often.

     

    I am looking at getting a new lens to take advantage of the triple rebate offers. I'd love to

    have the 85/1.2L, but there is no rebate on that lens right now. I might also consider the

    100/2.8 Macro.

     

    I've always wanted the 70-200/2.8L IS, but for one, it's a bit expensive, and with my crop

    factor I'm not sure how useful it'd be for portraits. The 135/2L seems nice, I can get a 1.4x

    if I need a longer lens for track, and the 135/2L + 1.4x will still be less expensive than the

    70-200/2.8L IS. But I might need the 70-135 range for some of my work. So I'm kindda

    torn between these 2 lens. Any advice would be highly appreciated!

×
×
  • Create New...