lars_brorson_fich

<p >Hi</p>

<p >There should be several interesting new DSLRs coming from SONY according to this website:

<p ><a href="http://photorumors.com/2009/07/13/more-sony-dslr-rumors/">http://photorumors.com/2009/07/13/more-sony-dslr-rumors/</a></p>

<p > </p>

</p>

<p > </p>

<p > </p>

<p >If you are on a budget, so watch out for the ink-prices. I had almost decided on an Epson, until I discovered that Epson ink cost almost 30 % more pr. ml. than a HP for that particular kind of printer (pigment- ink).</p>

<p >Re. Lars</p>

<p >“Brought up” with digital cameras I have never sought of Hasselblad og Leica´s , as they are fare out of reach in digital, but I more and more often find myself switching of all automatic, including the autofocus – and that’s my point – it gives you a wonderful sense control, and it makes your Everest a little steeper. So, of course the equipment itself means something, but may be the most wonderful thing is how you sense light through the camera, and how aware it makes you of things, regardless of film or digital, Leica, Hasselblad or just an ordinary plain Nikon.</p>

<p >Re. Lars</p>

Thank you all for your answers. To Charles - here is an exampel of what I mean by "ghosting". to be honest I dont use a lens hood. I am not sure if that might be the problem because it seems to emrege in all kind of diferent lightkonditions.

Re. Lars

I use a Singh-Ray variable ND filter, which can get me down 8 stops, but I have terrible problems with what I believe

I “ghosting”. Can anyone recommend an ND filter or filtersystem, that is sufficiently coated for use with a digital

camera ?

Re. Lars Brorson Fich

Hi Thorir.

I dont know much about the technical details, but I just whant to say: "Good decision !"

Re. Lars