dogbert
-
Posts
3,076 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by dogbert
-
-
Nice and very commendable, but I think the use of the grad ND is a bit overdone. Having the sky darker than the foreground doesn't look quite natural to me. -
really nice. I'd love to see a huge print of this.
-
This one I am not so keen about. The sky is a bit washed out, especially the right hand corner. The plants look a bit chopped off at the bottom, which I don't find overly pleasing. Sorry but I figure it is best to be honest.
-
Really nice. I suspect a big enlargement would make a really nice piece of art. -
-
-
Sorry Will, but I have to say I like your other work much better. You have some amazing work but this one leaves me a bit flat. The HDR makes it all look a bit too perfect - great micro contrast within forground, midground and background, but no overall contrast between the various elements in the picture. The colours and the subject matter don't really speak to me. Clearly others like it, so you can probably ignore my comments.
-
-
-
For some reason I quite like this one. What do you think?
-
-
-
Its a really great shot and I like it very much. Two things disturb me a little bit. The loss of deatil in the shadow areas bothers me (it looks a bit murky) as does the prow of the boat on the right being cropped off. Stepping back a foot or two to include the prow, while cropping to a more panoramic format to keep the prow and keel of the boat on the left in the same relative position would work better for me.
-
-
also the liquid looks to thin to be egg white.
Great stuff though.
-
Really nice work, but it looks a little bit too staged. The gap between the boot and the egg and the fact that the top of the egg is not also being crushed makes it unconvincing.
-
Obvioulsy a huge amount of effort and talent went into creating this, but IMHO I don't think it works fully. To pull this of I think the image has to look a bit more natural. The lighting of the model is incosistent with the lighting of the lanscape elements an thus looks too obviously like studio lighting.
The mud juxtaposes and creates tension with the soft look of the water and model, which are otherwise heavenly.
The tree in the background bothers me too.
I guess overall the image looks too contrived and overworked to get me to suspend disbelief. On the otherhand, the image shows talent well beyond most of us.
-
Tell me what you think?
-
All constructive criticism welcome.
-
Nice picture. You seem to have quite a few dust spots though. -
Great colors, great composition. It almost has an impressionist look to it, yet it still looks quite real. Excellent.
-
Nice and well composed, but the light is ordinary (very harsh middle of the day) and the sky lacks some drama. Shooting early morning, late afternoon or in dramatic weather would have added more interest. You could try increasing the contrast in photoshop to darken the sky and lighten the light house to give a but more punch.
-
I actually like it the way it is. It may be too late to reshoot now but, I can imagine in my head a more panoramic crop with the image extended out to the right.
-
What Art said.
Untitled
in Landscape
Posted
Love the foreground but the colour of the sky is a bit offputting to me. It looks like one of those Cokin colour filters was used.