sallycd

Guy, I forgot to thank you of your comments to my photo

portfolio,sally

Thank you for the feedbacks,Guy,Brian and Michael. And I agree

with Michael in what he said 80% +. I said this because some of the

things Michael was referring to I needed to research or read

about them.

Here comes my question, do you have any studies or statistics to this

particular site "photo net" that we are abusing our ratings? (High

ratings that is.)In that note,aren't someone supposed to do something

of these abused, giving 2/1 ratings without critiquing? But I know

this is another matter that has been up for the forum. I needed end

results to this too.And why a certain rule was adopted.

ARE WE REALLY ABUSING, OUR HIGHER RATINGS?. AM I?

I take it personally when I was not allowed to rate accordingly (high rate)to that person who took the time viewing my posting. I could not come back in 14 days for that!for rating! I have other important things to do!. But why "14 days"? What is it in 14 days

after?

By the way, I appreciated very much the you feedbacks, sally

So,why is that? Is it true? We needed your answers. I deleted some of my posting before but not lately.I did it when I learned

I was posting beyond the file size requirements.

Thanks for bringing this up,sally

I was wondering if this " you are not suppose to rate " rule

has been on the forum before.I needed feedback about this

matter. Thanks,sally

Actually, I disagreed what Patrick wrote.If you say

something or write something one should put their

names under it.Be honest and back it up with your name.

Let it be known it's you!That's called making a stand.

But if you're not comfortable about it,be anonymous.

That's your right too.<div></div>

I strongly agree with Michael.No one should be permitted

to rate anonymously.

Let's have a voice to this since we are paying...Or make a

survey.