Jump to content

john kissane

Members
  • Posts

    151
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by john kissane

  1. Allen the "best" is always subjective. Don't expect a final answer. Ask yourself what you need and/or what you want. Visualize a data base structure that will fill all your points. Then download the SW (most have 30 day trials} and test each one to your requirments. Then you will probably suit YOUR purposes not others opinions.

     

    I personally use (the old) PS Album 2 which is around 50 US for over 21,000 images and it works for me. Organization only. Good luck.

  2. Four days, Denver. Head up to Estes Park, Rocky Mountain National Park, via Boulder or via Loveland and Big Thompson (scenic canyon). Then head south back to highway 70 (need map naturally) and hit Vail.

     

    Lots and lots of photo opportunities.

     

    Or

     

    Head south Colorado Springs, Garden of the Gods, Pikes Peak and other area attractions Cripple Creek and old mine towns.

     

    Hope the local can give you the weather and road warnings.

  3. Ya, a lot of folks over on the PS Elements forum are bitching up a storm over it, claiming 1) it's only a fix of a few bugs from 3 and they are being charged for it 2) losing their old browser for the new organizer (which a lot of people hate) and 3) price and no real discount for upgrade. etc.

     

    Then the Mac folks are bitching because there is no Mac Vs. 4, yet.

     

    Go figure.

  4. I'm a happy user of ProShow Gold and see there is a fairly new

    professional version out called ProShow Producer. It has a big price

    tag but frankly their advertising pages have not made me flip out

    and buy it as a "must have" item. The new features list is not

    really overwhelmings, maybe the big price has more to do with

    efficiency.

     

    And before I get the posts to download the trial and see for

    yourself, I will. I just want to get some other opinions first.

     

    Thanks

  5. Bas, I see the investment misundersanding. I repeated Terry Bowen question, -- Friends, So what is the answer? Invest in Olympus or not?

     

    That was to show Mark Chappell answer with which I agreeded. Anyway, damn internet reading confustion!

     

    Now your question is: Yes Oly dropped OM too, just like Canon dropped FD, what's the diff?

     

    The difference is Canon stayed in the high end with new systems and products to help their clients up the stepladder. Oly left their clients on the first rung and devoted all their resources to point and shoot amature market. For OVER 10 years.

     

    Hence my Once Burned comment in regard to the survival of 4/3. Maybe it will work, maybe it won't. For me, I can't say I'm convinced they won't cut and run again. Regards

  6. Bas said:

     

    I wouldn't call introducing one (yes, only one, the OM-707) consumer quality AF camera with a handfull of similar lenses and then dropping it "having a history". I doubt any "investors" got hurt.

     

    First, what hat did you pull "investors" out of on my statement Oly has a history. I don't give a damn about investors, I care about photographers in the "having a history" statement. Secondly, I think you need a history lesson. Oly ignored the total OM system not one camera. Unhappy photographers, not investors. Regards

  7. If I understand you correctly the answer is yes, you maintain your files structure on the hard drive as you want. What Elements Organizer does is import a "pointer" and thumnail of your file to organize and keyword as you wish. Your hard drive remains the same. One caution is that you should not MOVE files directly in the hard drive. You should move files from within the organizer or your photo will disconnect from the pointer. HTH
  8. Sorry for the delay in answering.

     

    It was a keyword "Photoshop" link in the following thread on the Digital Darkroom forum. I probably was not logged in.

     

    Photoshop CS tutorials by Chris Wick (2005-08-09)

     

    The keyword is not their today.

  9. Laurie said: "With the exception of this thread, the last 10 posts to this forum have been questions about site features, friendly suggestions, notification of a technical glitch, or acknowledgment of a site upgrade."

     

    Yes, and that's a positive, but since you read this thread you know exactly what I was refering to...not the Help questions.

     

    Jamie said: "I guess it's a matter of how you look at things...it says that PN isn't hiding behind anything. If you've got a gripe then speak up, just as you've done here John...Many questions get answered in this forum. There are lots of users willing to answer questions from others looking for help...I say a hearty "Cheers" to PN for keeping this forum open."

     

    Agree...I never said close it, I said something like "improve" things. :-)

  10. Stumbled on PN a while ago. Loved the forum, learned a lot. Hung

    around and looked at the great and not so great photos (pics).

    Decided to send in my money to support what I think was a bargain.

    Posted a few photos (happy experience) but unfortunately never got

    into the swing of rating other. I was trying to figure out how you

    rate thousand of fotos ??? Tried to learn and come across this

    thread: photo.net Site Feedback Forum.

     

    Wow what a turnoff. If anyone really wants to improve things, do

    something about this thread. It ranges from rants to ... (you add

    your word here). Best to all. No response necessary here as you can

    consider this my rant. Period. I'm off to checking the forums and

    looking at the pics. :-)

×
×
  • Create New...