Jump to content

david_lee2

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by david_lee2

  1. Thanks, everyone, for your answers. I sent the camera to CFS, they repaired it, and it looks fine now.

     

    They said that they "cleaned cmos, vf, mirror". What is "VF"?

     

    Also, I was told that flash pictures using ETTL-II would be about a stop darker than with ETTL. Is this true?

     

    Thanks,

  2. Thanks for your responses. The flash does indeed fire. I've gone through all the Custom Fn's and flash settings but don't see anything that could cause this. No CF's set on the flash, nor anything dialed in....

     

    When I use my 10D with the 580EX, everything works fine. Could it be something to do with ETTL-II? I've read on the web that ETTL-II has a tendency to underexpose but not to the extent that I'm seeing.

  3. I'm having problems using my 5D with my 580EX. When I use it on "P"

    mode to take flash pictures, it comes out VERY underexposed, almost

    to the point of being black. Adjusting flash exposure compensation

    to +2 doesn't seem to help.

     

    I upgraded from a 10D, and I never had any problems using the 580EX

    with it.

     

    Do I need to get the camera serviced? Or could there be a setting

    that I'm not using right? I went through the 5D's custom functions

    but didn't see anything that could cause this.

     

    Any help would be appreciated.

     

    Thanks,<div>00E37J-26312884.thumb.JPG.8d605863453a57073f86f21a4cc0079e.JPG</div>

  4. Can someone explain why larger pixels would give a greater dynamic range?

     

    And how would you rank the 10D, 1D, 1DM2, and 1Ds in terms of dynamic range? I have a 10D and have always been unhappy with blown highlights. Do the 1D or 1DM2 exhibit a noticeably better dynamic range?

     

    Thanks,

  5. It happened to me just a few months ago! I also let my subscription lapse, then suddenly got a notice from NSA. I called OP and told them about the situation, they then "cancelled" my subscription.

     

    If my credit rating gets hurt by this, I'm complaining to the BBB and my state's (CA) Dept. of Consumer Affairs.

  6. I admittedly didn't do the calibration (nor am I viewing) under controlled conditions - just my room which was lit by daylight. I also have tungsten bulbs in the room, so I realize my setup is not ideal for calibration.

     

    I am using PS 7, and did turn on Proof Colors.

     

    The print doesn't look bad by any means, it just looks darker than what was on my screen.

     

    I take it from the answers that the print should match with what the monitor shows, then?

     

    I'll try the Epson profiles as well.

     

    Thanks for your help.

  7. Hello -

     

    How close should I be able to get in terms of matching my prints from

    my Epson 1270 to what I see on my monitor?

     

    I bought a printer profile for my printer/paper (1270/Epson Premium

    Gloss) combination from inkjetmall.com. After I installed that, I

    used the ColorVision Spyder to calibrate my monitor (a Trinitron).

     

    After I made some test prints, I noticed that the prints turned out

    darker than what showed on the monitor. The prints weren't

    unsatisfactorily dark, but noticeably. Is this normal, or should I

    be expecting pretty much WYSIWYG?

     

     

    Thanks,

  8. I seriously doubt you're going to be able to buy a suitable backpack for your budget. My advice would be to splurge and get a nicer one; your back will thank you.

     

    I recently got the LowePro Nature Trekker AWII ($230), and I think it will be able to handle your stuff. I can put into it: Canon 10D with 70-200/2.8L attached; EOS 3 with 28-135 attached; 550EX; 1.4X extender; filters; film; and 50/1.8 with room leftover. Plus, I attach my tripod to it.

     

    It has the hip-hugging straps which take the load off your shoulders and onto your hips. True, it is heavy, but I only hiked for a mile or so at a time.

  9. I noticed that the 28-70/2.8 has been replaced by the 24-70/2.8 (when

    did this happen?). How does the 24-70 perform? I checked photodo

    for ratings, but it hasn't been rated.

     

    I also tried doing a search on photo.net but couldn't come up with

    many references to it (maybe I wasn't typing in the right keywords).

     

    Thanks,

  10. Hello -

     

    I'm located in Northern California, and am due for my company's

    sabbatical next spring (around June). So I have a month to go places

    (to take photographs!) where I normally wouldn't be able to go.

     

    Where are some of the most amazing, fascinating places that people

    have gone for photography? I was thinking of Antarctica, Galapagos,

    Africa... I should probably go on a photography tour as opposed to

    alone, right?

     

    One thing I should mention is that I'm not in the best of shape so no

    mountain climbing (unless by trolley :-) !

     

    Any advice for me? I'm a serious amateur and am excited about the

    opportunity I'll have.

     

    Thanks for all your input.

×
×
  • Create New...