david_cassidy2

Just a question to stir things up with Canon and Nikon (and just

about any other manufacturer).

Why can't they make an image-stabilized camera body? It should be at

least an option on some models.

Besides being able to rip us off for IS lenses of their non-IS

counterparts, is there a technical reason they can't do this?

Opinions?

Dhruba, I'm doing what I said ... making images. I shoot film and digital. As I said, this whole argument is ridiculous and a waste of time. One should not spend a great deal of time worrying about whether to go "film or digital". What does it matter? People should just shoot what they like. Just make images. I don't care if an image came from a Nikon, Canon, Minolta, Fuji, Olympus, Mamiya, Bronica, film or digital. It's the image that counts, not the medium.

Use what *YOU* like and be proud of your images!

Not this question again ... Film vs Digital.

Who cares?

I shoot both. I like both. I like making images, and I don't care how they're made. I've seen great images from both.

I'll keep shooting both until I can't. Then I'll just move on to what I *can* shoot. Maybe it won't even be digital *or* film ... maybe it'll be some mind-blowing new technology that involves a film/digital/ice cream hybrid.

It's the images that are important, not the medium.

Just ... simply ... make images.

Enjoy!