Jump to content

ian_porteous2

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by ian_porteous2

    Death Valley Sunrise

          13

    I have enlarged this picture to 16x20 and had it printed on a lightjet. The print is about the quality of a 645 print enlarged to 16x20. Definetly better then a 35mm image enlarged to 16x20 but not the same as a 4x5. It is also has almost zero noise.

     

    Since you can not see it with you own eyes, you may not believe it, but it makes a very good enlargement up to about 16x20.

     

    I have printed pictues enlarged to this size from 6x6, 35mm scanned at 4000dpi, and now from the D30. The D30 pictures made from combined shots are more similar to the 6x6 then the 35mm. YMMV.

    lily pad

          6
    I love the colors but - 1) the blue is so intense I thought it was a manipulated 2) the shape in the center of the leaf is distracting. I can't figure out what is causing the shape, and it keeps drawing my attention.

    Death Valley Sunrise

          13
    Besides increasing the depth of field it increases the resolution of the final image and increases the field of fiew. With the Canon D30, a 17 mm lens is like a 28mm on 35mm film, so an increased field of view can be useful.

    Death Valley Sunrise

          13

    The picture is composed of 4 horizontal shots.

    Each shot was focused at a different distance so that the closest and farthest points were kept sharp.

    I used panorama tools (free but the best software for this) to join the photos. I used the PTGui interface to panorama tools.

    The pictures were just taken with a normal ballhead, instead of one that rotates around the nodal point of the lens, but since there were not near and far objects overlapping it works fine.

×
×
  • Create New...