Jump to content

digitalbeast

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by digitalbeast

    tulip

          2

    Yeah, its quite beautiful. Well I don't know if I would say erotic, it is a flower, but its nice.

     

    Does the addition of the extension tube help your magnification at all? Was this image cropped?

    ~ Forest ~

          27

    this is stunning! Forest scenes draw me in, especially here, where you've captured such cool and mysterious atmosphere.

    Salvatore to answer your question, the lens was at 18mm, which is 27mm when you factor in the digital slr magnification of 1.5.

  1. Dog Slaughter Falls!

    This area is sweet, but I should have gotten there earlier in the morning; harsh light made me search for a usable vantage point. Here, I'm under the cleft of rocks, with a large, bright highlight in the water cropped out just to the bottom left.

    What do you think? Andy ideas for improvement?

  2. Panned with subject, slow shutter speed, and fill flash to attempt to freeze motion.

    This was my first time trying this effect, and he was the only rider I came across :-(

    I'm trying to get better at action stuff, so any tricks/tips/insights are very welcome!! Next time I'm going to bump up to 400 ISO for a faster shutter speed, and just keep working with my panning. The blur here seems a bit too long, and the rider not as "frozen" as I would have liked.

    Thanks for your help!

  3. Taken from my kitchen, looking out onto the deck, with my brother's Sigma 28-200 lens.

    This is at 300mm on my digital! Anyway, birds are a new subject for me, so your

    insightful comments are appreciated.

  4. Thanks to my crit panel, I'll return to the river soon with a better idea of what to do. Thanks for your help!

    • use "normal focal length (maybe 50mm or more)
    • get in tighter to reveal more details in the city
    • The contrast, or lack of it, is appealing to me here
  5. Please re-read my comment, and notice the lack of literary clues that I'm "scolding" you. Its easy to misinterpret written text, and easy to assume certain tones of voice. This is why I wouldn't write something with the intention of any tone of voice being conveyed.

    I share your love for exploring photoshop, and photography. Critique is critique, not a personal attack, not a scolding. My comments were constructive criticism. This isn't about "liking" something, or such subjective matters.

    I apologize if my comment was worded in a way that allowed it to be easily misunderstood. That wasn't the intention.

  6. This is a beautiful place, and you've done a beautiful job capturing it.

    The big thing that I noticed right away was that you chose to focus on the foreground rocks, and the water blurring over them. I admire that choice, it works nicely.

  7. Why do you want to master a digital reflection? Why not capture a real reflection? Why would you use a photo marked as "discarded", one that you don't like, to put time into trying to create an effect?

    Photoshop is an incredible tool, for digital darkroom work; but it becomes cheesy when you go overboard. I would suggest sticking to basic photo detail techniques that will make your good photos POP. (Levels, Curves, Color Balance, Unsharp Mask...)

    P.S.- The Ohio River isn't always muddy. It can become beautifully clear during the summer. Periods of rain cause the murkiness.

×
×
  • Create New...