Jump to content

scott_j

Members
  • Posts

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by scott_j

  1. Any thoughts - Very tough shot, keeping everyone still for five minutes. I would have

    liked a longer exposure for better star trails, but, I'm happy with the way the Milky Way

    came out. Not sure how to get it to look as it really was, it was much brighter.

  2. Comments welcome - Rendered an old photo shot with "APS" film. The coarseness of the grain made for an lacking photo however, provided a basis for this piece of art. Thoughts? What do you do with your old not so useful pictures?
  3. Not so many miles away a clear sunny summer day, but, at times the Tetons control

    their own local weather. On the other side of the lake, a quick dump of cold rain and

    the rising fog from the cold. I have created this piece into art, helpful comments are

    welcome. Does the image grab your attention? does it keep it? What does the image

    express or say to you? Technically what is right or wrong? Thanks for your

    comments.

  4. What is the value of a critic, if you can not add objectivity to what you say. This page is for critiques which are vastly different from opinions. What I heard was an opinion.

     

    Secondly Steve does not give us the ability to even judge his abilities to critique as he provides no portfolio for the PhotoNet community to view.

     

    I made no comment as to politeness. Steve's comments were quite respectful, but, simply were an opinion not a critique.

     

    A critique is "The word critic comes from the Greek κριτικός, kritikós - one who discerns, which itself arises from the Ancient Greek word κριτής, krités, meaning a person who offers reasoned judgment or analysis, value judgment, interpretation, or observation. ..."

     

    So I will apologize to those of you who need something for airing my opinnion on Mehmets page.

     

    As a critique, I find the use of light, color and depth done quite well. I would like to learn the techniques applied. The image has great depth and gives the viewer a path to take a journey down the stream (across the image), the image composition walks the viewer from the foreground to the back ground via the streams meandering path, while the tree and mountains do a wonderful job of framing the image.

     

    I'm intrigued as to the use of shadowed foreground and reflective light in the background.

     

    What is done nicely is the sharp crisp foreground and soft subtle haze in the background.

     

    The only element of the image I am not excited about is the sky. it is too bad there was not a good thunderhead building, with some blue sky in the distance, but, you take what you are given many times on road trips.

     

    Regards,

    Scott

  5. Steve I am with Mehmet on this, where are your images of comparison. Proof then speak.

     

    Personally Mehmet images are wonderful. A great blend of photography and art. I been a fan for a couple years and Mehmet your only getting better. If you ever get in the Phoenix area let me know I'd enjoy going on a shoot with you. -Scott

     

    I'd enjoy knowing where this is and why it is a classic. thx

  6. Rick,

     

    This is a wonderful capture. The cloud washout on the right is nature at work. I enjoy the light rays in the cloud, which translate into sun rays on the castle. The dark to light from left to right also enhances the interest in the image.

     

    Thanks for sharing

    Scott

  7. Kim,

     

    I like it. As mentioned the bird dominates the scene, you might back off the solid black a bit. I really like the touch of color, maybe just a touch of color on a spot in the water.

     

    Otherwise super job.

     

    Scott

×
×
  • Create New...