Jump to content

steve foster

Members
  • Posts

    516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by steve foster

  1. If she new anything about photography, which she should do given her background. She would know that every photographer has his or her individual style. This style and interpretation is what people pay for. That is why some photographers can ask more money than others. (skill in marketing also helps!) You should be saying look at my pictures. If you like them I'll do it, if not I won't.

     

    It's like asking Joe Scarborough to do a commission for you in the style of Salvador Dali.

  2. Does anyone here use Webplus 10 and lightroom. I am having great difficulty in

    incorporating either the html gallery or a flash gallery produced in Lightroom

    into Webplus.

     

    I have tried just importing the gallery.swf file, but nothing happens. And in

    the flash import window there are empty spaces for parameters and additional

    images. Which parameters do I use and which additional images. I am new to this.

    When I designed my site I had no intention of using flash but as I use Lightroom

    and will be getting a free copy of it on release I thought I might as well use

    the functions available. I have also saved a html gallery with similar

    unproductive results. Oh on looking through the files that lightroom creates for

    the flash gallery there are several .xml files do I need these. As I have said I

    am complete newbie at flash and ANY help will be of great assistance to me.

     

    Many thanks

     

    Steve

  3. Hi guys,

     

    I've been asked to do some work for a charity ball (invites, tickets, etc.) I

    normally use PSCS just for photo work. So I have question regarding DTP;

     

    Is it possible to view all the fonts available to print out, without having to

    go through hundreds of fonts and try each one individually.

     

    Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.

     

    Many thanks.

     

    Steve

  4. I'm an RSP (Rawshooter pro) user and as such will recieve a free copy of version one when it ships. So I am on no lose situation, apart from the fact that when I upgrade my camera I will not be able to use RSP.

     

    So far Lightroom has ticked most boxes but not all. The good points are that there is alot of black and white functionality. and plenty of tools to play with. Results are pretty good too. Unfortunately the workflow is still not very good, all that scrolling up and down starts to wear a bit after a while. The sharpening is very crude, and the detail extraction is abysmal (especially if you compare it to RSP). The fill is better than RSP however. I like a previous poster am not too keen on the curves dialogue, you should be able to drag your white and black points from this. And the crop tool is just plain shit. However as Adobe has to compete in a difficult market I have no doubt that by the time it reaches release it will be a much more streamlined, less hungry programme. I still find myself going back to RSP though.

  5. I've just had an idea. I've never tried this so I don't know if it will work, but, if you select the colour range of the fringing with an eye dropper and then use change colour and change it to the nearest dominaant colour. This would probably get some results on the most obvious cases of fringing such as mountains in shadow against a vivid blue background. Just change the colour of the fringing to match the blue. I would do this on a seperate layer so that you can play with it a bit to get something looking right. I will try this myself tonight to see if it works.
  6. I use three types of fliter. The polarizer. ND filters. And graduated ND Filters. This last one is important for not blowing highlights in the sky on landscapes, you will never get details out of highlights that are blown. You could do a HDR image on the computer instead using multiple images but unless you know what you are doing they can look very fake.
  7. Channel mixer, or calculations (not as difficult as it sounds). But in reality there are many ways of achieving a B&W print. I would start getting used to shooting in RAW to start with. And if you have Lightroom (on beta for free at the moment) then there is quite alot of B&W goodies in the develop module to get the look your after. Failing that make a colour picture that is slightly over saturated and use the channel mixer to adjust. (over saturating makes the channel mixer more agressive. If you do not like this then just make sure you start out with a correctly exposed colour picture).
×
×
  • Create New...