ed_te_pas

If you're shooting with a 50mp body, you need all the sharpness you can get. So 24-70 II is the lens to go for. Forget the reach of the 24-105. With 50mp a slight crop wil give you the same fov. And with much sharper results.

<p>The little girl got a ring too, she brook down in tears.</p><div></div>

<p>This one was very spontanious.</p>

<div></div>

<p>This is one of my favorites. A very cute and spontaneous little girl. </p><div></div>

<p>In fact she asks for a professional treatment, she should have paid for a pro photographer.</p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>I suppose dual memory slot cameras might circumvent that if someone were really bent on sneaking images home.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Give them 2 cards to return or 4 or 6. That easy that simple.</p>

<p>A little search on facebook, told me she didn't made it. Sad so sad.</p>

<p>She actually hadn't a clue what his intentions were (not that common over here), but she quickly reacted with a smile and captured it. I particular like this shot, because the bride is struggling with cancer at the age of 23. I hope she'll overcome this. It is such a sweet girl.</p><div></div>

<p>Does uncle Bob has a contract too? He too is shooting for himself and maybe the couple. If I should shoot for free (which I never do), there will be no contract, I am uncle Bob on that particular moment. Only when handing over the CD the couple has to sign something :-)</p>

<p>Why do you have a contract if you're shooting for free?</p>

<p>Go to the learning tab, there should be a lot of info there</p>

<p>The chosen lightning (flash) kills the mood IMO.</p>

<p>Pricing seems ok, compared to Nikons D3s.</p>

 

<p>Richard: according to google analytics in the past month my mobile site got 18 visits. My main site in flash got 346 vistits. This says it all for me, well maybe not all be enough. Thanks.</p>

<p>Matt: My website is ranked "1" in the city I live and supports both html5 and flash.</p>

<p>Not supporting flash now and in the future sucks. How on earth could any manufacturer make a computer which doesn't support flash? If you anyway buy this, I'll compliment the marketing of Apple convincing you buying the damn thing. In the end it's all about marketing.</p>

<p>Just love the shine of this image. A Romanian couple immigrated to Holland. A lovely and very nice couple. This image is SOOC, only converted to B/W.</p><div></div>

<p>I want to be a millionaire. Any advise please.</p>

<p>another</p>

<div></div>

<p>As with any camera, the higher the ISO the lower the dynamic range. Everybody is carrying some sort of camera nowadays, so the guests are blasting away with their camera's, so my flash won''t hardly be noticed. During my last wedding a video guy used some horrible fluorescent light that killed the mood during the first dance instantly. The bride complaint (to me) after wards, she dared not telling this to the video guy. I was glad that I had my remote flashes: they reduced the video guy's light to a candle and recreated a better mood for images of the first dance. Try shooting that with available light, you can instantly dump the images. So be prepared for any situation.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Thankfully I don't live in California</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Jeff A, lives in near Scotland where most of the time they have an overcast sky, so low contrast ratios.<br>

Again use flash if you need to, but don't make any shooting style into some sort of religion. You have to deliver in any circumstance.</p><div></div>

<p>No D3s will solve your contrast ratio problems.</p>

<p>I shoot only with available light and if it happens to be flash, then flash it shall be.<br>

Strong points of photographers like Jeff A are composition and timing, not light. He very much shoots like Cartier-Bresson. At least he's is inspired by CB and takes the light as it is, but composition is primary, that's why he uses lots of BW images. It's easier to use dodge and burn on a BW image than on a color image. If you use flash the right way you can hardly see the difference.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>First, make sure you haven't promised more than you can deliver</p>

</blockquote>

<p>You gotta be kidding. If she delivers nothing, equals they paid nothing.<br>

Leila, you answer is in your question. You need fast glass. If the 70-200/2.8 is too heavy, use a monopod. 2nd cam is very important. Try to get the rent paid, looks reasonable to me. Certainly they are aware that you are shooting for ZERO.</p>

<p>I like the antique b/w treatment. Beautiful bride and nice place to shoot a classic wedding.</p>

<p>Expected March 2011 price $1000<br>

<a href="http://vimeo.com/15154318">http://vimeo.com/15154318</a></p>