Jump to content

yasumasa_yanagisawa

Members
  • Posts

    1,202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by yasumasa_yanagisawa

  1. Thank you, Stephen. I didn't know this word. <p>

    Aboriginal wood carving to avoid disease. I have some <a href=http://

    www.photo.net/photo/3522825>others</a>.<div>00Gtfx-30514084.jpg.5ff838ca4e9bc15a423d1dcd8435b4a0.jpg</div>

  2. This is the best answer to your question, Jamie. Exactly the one

    David mentioned: converting unit from 9x12 cm to 3 1/4 x 4 1/4 in.

    Grafic film holder. Looks like hand made but written "FEATHER-LITE

    adaptor for American film, HOLLYWOOD PHOTO MFG.CO./HOLLYWOOD 28,

    CALIF.USA". My camera is Bergheil 9x12 and I show you examples <a

    href=http://www.photo.net/photo/3944254>(1)</a><a

    href=http://www.photo.net/photo/3871305>(2)</a>

    taken by this adaptor. But no idea where to find it, sorry.<div>00FF0x-28149184.jpg.a4c162c1229d71d7e79e476300c3bc52.jpg</div>

  3. Hmm... Nnnee.., Please visit my folder <a href=http://www.photo.net/

    photodb/folder?folder_id=352312>Brass Lens Paradise</a>. All by 50 to

    100 years old cameras and lenses and by vintage way. There is no need

    of technic nor lighting. Natural is the best. By using present high

    speed films you can get any result far better than your ancestors'.

    Antique feeling such as aged color is an another story. You can get

    it easily by photoshop.

  4. I have never heard of 210. But I have 80(barrel), 105(Compur), 105

    (barrel) and 135/3.5(Compur), all using dayly. Xenotar is known by

    its high resolution and yellowish color effect, may be because of

    Lanthanum glass, same as Biotar or other high performance, radio

    active lenses of B/W era. Xenotar was designed for B/W photos.

    <P>

    Its image circle is rather big and my 135 covers british <a href=

    http://www.photo.net/photo/1908963>half plate</a>.

    210 may cover 8x10, I suppose. 105 was designed for 6x9cm but it

    covers 4x5. 105 barrel might have been used for process work, because

    of its high resolution abily. But I put it in a helicoid for 35mm

    use, in which I can get quite unique <a href=http://www.photo.net/

    photodb/photo?photo_id=2939938>"Bokeh"</a> (out of focus effect) in

    fully opened aperture. It's really unique, no other lens will have

    and I am enjoying this individuality. 80 is well known by Rolleiflex

    getting high reputation especially from portrait photographers. I

    really want to see images by 210.<div>00BDig-21972384.jpg.b45ba1f95290e9962ae16e7bf70938d9.jpg</div>

  5. Carsten, I can give you one strange idea. If you want to take photos

    in the mountain, the best answer is just in front of you. That is

    Bergheil 9x12, the smallest LF made in 30's by yor ancestor. I have

    been using it mainly for portrait, but it was made for mountain

    hikers, isn't it? You know the meaning of "Bergheil". In the

    mountain, you may not need so much "swing" or "tilt". It is conpact

    and not heavy but very strong. And lens interchangeable. Please have

    a look of some examples, <a href=http://www.photo.net/photodb/

    photo?photo_id=1891260>(1)</a>, <a href=http://www.photo.net/photodb/

    photo?photo_id=1897221>(2)</a>. My Bergheil has special springback

    converter to Graflex size folder (3 1/4 x 4 1/4 in.). Not so much

    defferece with 4x5. In LF work, lens is more important and

    interesting than body, as you know well.

×
×
  • Create New...