First off, I'm not from Australia and I do not know AM or any of his/her Aussie friends(LOL). So, do not accuse me of being part of this rabble rousing group.(What is a Rabble anyway, any definitions?) I came to this sight to get an opinion on the Littman 45.
Since Mr. Littman feels his camera is not a conversion, then I guess I was looking at the wrong Littman website. Because all the cameras there looked like they were Polaroid bodies converted into a fine 4X5 piece of camera equipment, not a 4X5 built from scratch. I think I'll buy one of those, because they seem to be well made and of great quality. Especailly for a conversion. That must have taken a great deal of work.
I would like to know if anyone has seen the other Littman 45, that Mr Littman is refering to. I still have not seen this Littman 45, since Mr. Littman insists his camera is not a conversion. I would love to see this inovative, built from scratch, brand new camera that was not made from the body of an old polaroid 110 camera body, it must be wonderful.(Can you feel the sarcasim here?)
Here is a little something without sarcaism Mr. Littman. I was intent on purchasing your camera conversion and looked to your website. After reading a brief article, which mentions your camera conversion, I was very curious about the camera. Since your website really did not have a whole lot of technical information, I googled your name to find critiques, praises, COMPARISONS, and information. I stumble upon this thread. After reading the thread, and hoping to get tech data, I was disturbed by your responses. At first I was suprised to see you responded to the queston. But, after I read all of your responses, the tone and wording has put me off completely to purchasing your camera.
As a consumer I do not care about who patented what and when, I only care about the product. Is it the best? Is it worth the cost? Will it fill my needs? What are the technical aspects of the camera? Not one of your answers addressed these concerns. Not one of your answers help me to make an informed opinion. I do know, however, that you patented your camera. Unfortunatly, that does not help me. So, I regret to inform you that, your attituted and responses have swayed my decision. I will NOT be purchasing your camera. Maybe if you would have responed with more information about the camera and a little less information on the patented I would be parting with $2500.
Littman 45 Single/110 Polaroid question
in Large Format
Posted
First off, I'm not from Australia and I do not know AM or any of his/her Aussie friends(LOL). So, do not accuse me of being part of this rabble rousing group.(What is a Rabble anyway, any definitions?) I came to this sight to get an opinion on the Littman 45.
Since Mr. Littman feels his camera is not a conversion, then I guess I was looking at the wrong Littman website. Because all the cameras there looked like they were Polaroid bodies converted into a fine 4X5 piece of camera equipment, not a 4X5 built from scratch. I think I'll buy one of those, because they seem to be well made and of great quality. Especailly for a conversion. That must have taken a great deal of work.
I would like to know if anyone has seen the other Littman 45, that Mr Littman is refering to. I still have not seen this Littman 45, since Mr. Littman insists his camera is not a conversion. I would love to see this inovative, built from scratch, brand new camera that was not made from the body of an old polaroid 110 camera body, it must be wonderful.(Can you feel the sarcasim here?)
Here is a little something without sarcaism Mr. Littman. I was intent on purchasing your camera conversion and looked to your website. After reading a brief article, which mentions your camera conversion, I was very curious about the camera. Since your website really did not have a whole lot of technical information, I googled your name to find critiques, praises, COMPARISONS, and information. I stumble upon this thread. After reading the thread, and hoping to get tech data, I was disturbed by your responses. At first I was suprised to see you responded to the queston. But, after I read all of your responses, the tone and wording has put me off completely to purchasing your camera.
As a consumer I do not care about who patented what and when, I only care about the product. Is it the best? Is it worth the cost? Will it fill my needs? What are the technical aspects of the camera? Not one of your answers addressed these concerns. Not one of your answers help me to make an informed opinion. I do know, however, that you patented your camera. Unfortunatly, that does not help me. So, I regret to inform you that, your attituted and responses have swayed my decision. I will NOT be purchasing your camera. Maybe if you would have responed with more information about the camera and a little less information on the patented I would be parting with $2500.
Brian (USA not Aus)