seth_prince
-
Posts
123 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by seth_prince
-
-
yes, i calibrate in a dark room. i've got version 3.4. but i'm wondering if in the "easy" mode
i set gamma and white point in the OSD, or does the "easy" calibration do that for me?
-
i'm using an i-1 display on a lacie ebIV 19". mac platform. i've done a few different
calibrations in a row and seem to be getting rather varied results. i've only used the "easy"
mode because with "advanced" the result is VASTLY different.
i believe i should be using a gamma of 2.2 and D65 white point. do i set these in the OSD
before doing the the calibration? in other words, is "easy" calibration dependent on these
settings or are they taken into account in the process. If i change the gamma and white
point after a calibration, should i re-calibrate my monitor for the new settings?
-
let me start out with the little problem that just popped up very recently. I will do an index
scan, then a prescan. I start to crop the image with the automatic marquee box that's
there. i crop one side. that's fine. i crop another side. that's fine. I crop a third side and the
software craps out.
I thought i would reinstall the software but i lost the disk. Call me crazy-insane, but i'd
like to stick with the minolta software. I'm just used to it.
is there a newer version i can DL from the website? which version would you recommend.
-
will the film holder for the 5400 II work in the regular 5400? i'm having issues with the
scan not centering, as seen here
-
here is a screen capture of the pre-scan window. there's nothing i can to to get the film
centered in the window. this is why i think a sensor must be out of alignmennt
-
nope, that's not it. forget what i said.
in my pre-scan mode there is a white boarder along the top and left side and a very thin
white boarder along the bottom. the right side does not have this white boarder. position
of the film affects nothing, except when moved too far to one side or the other to expose
the space between the film frames. i think it must be that something is mis-aligned.
-
actually it seems that i need a negative carrier with a slightly larger window.
-
no matter where i position the negative inside the window, it always previews the image of
center to the bottom left so that the top and right side have a large margin of white space.
could it be that the sensor is misaligned?
-
entrada fine are bright seems to work very well so far. nice results for my b&w printing on
the r2400
-
i don't know how my eyes missed it. but there it is:
Formerly Archival Matte Paper
is epson enhanced matte not archival quality? does epson have an archival quality matte
paper? what alternate 13 x 19 matte paper would you recomend?
-
Can someone suggest the best resolution and Hz for a 19" CRT for photoshop-intensive
work. Unfortunately 1600x1200 is out due to very annoying ghosting effect.
thanks
-
when switching between, for instance, photo black and matte black, what is the best way
to store the cartridge that is not in use?
-
thank you for all your responses.
i have made my decision.
i will let you know my findings and results.
-
Canon? just to thow a wrench at the monkey on your back
-
as i mentioned below, I want to get an A3, archival quality printer. But the more i read, the
more confused i get. Here's exactly what i will be doing with it:
monochrome and color printing on both matte and lustre paper. I DON'T CARE ABOUT
GLOSSY
I've looked at the R2400, R1800 and the HP 8750 (don't know about Cannon).
I'm kind of leaning towards the R2400. Here's why: (according to photo-i and cnet)
monochrome printing is very close to the HP. Color may be better than HP. Individual ink
tanks on R2400.
What i don't know: how does the HP do on lustre paper? does HP make a lustre paper?
-
do with lustre paper and color?
does HP make a lustre paper?
I don't care about glossy, i can't stand it.
-
$500 is my limit
I would like to do A3 size, archival quality.
-
after getting a number of tips on how to reduce the dust on my b&w film prior to
scanning, i went out and got anti-static film fluid and an antistatic cloth. results FAR
exceeded my expectations. I print to full-size A3 and can barely detect 1 blemish from
dust or hair.
-
made a scan of a slide a while ago. haven't used my scanner since then. major dust issues
in my apartment. made a test scan of the same slide with all of the same settings. what is
the best enlargement percentage should i view the 2 slides back to back? Viewing will me
done in photoshop cs.
-
it's going to take a lifetime and a half to clone out all that dust. ICE obviously wont work
with b&w. is there a fool-proof way to remove the dust from the film before scanning?
-
persistance beats resistance.
after a number of months of struggle in vain. Employing every prescribed and improvised
cleaning technique, with only worsening results, until i had lost all indication that the
thing ever spit ink to begin with. Coming terrifyingly close; within only a matter of 3 nerve
cells to be exact, of tossing this thing to the Freshkills Landfill... I have finally broken
through with (my fingers crossed, knocking on wood) what looks, so far, like stellar
results.
I had disassembled this thing almost entirely... well, i had unscrewed the hood, to see
better what was actually going on inside. I tried every concievable cleaning process. Or so I
had thought. Yesterday morning I got the bright idea to soak paper towelling in a mixture
of windex and MIS cleaning fluid. I laid it down in the track where the cartridge goes to
park, moved the ink carriage back into it's parking space, and left it for exactly 24 hours
as a last-ditch attempt to rescusitate this carcass.
-
a number of months ago i started losing nozzles on this printer (using mis b&w inks), until
all of them went completely dead. i followed all of inksupply.com's recomendations for
cleaning/testing cycles, ordered the injection cleaning system and followed directions as
specified with brand new cartidges. Absolutely nothing. is there anything else that can be
done, or is this thing destined for the landfill?
-
I haven't used the thing (minolta 5400) for a number of months now, and my apartment is
as dusty as a 1930 oklahoma farmstead. When i start scanning again, what signs will give
me indication that it has collected dust?
thanks for your help
-
is the advanced mode that much more accurate than the easy mode? Is it worth the hassle?
Minolta E-5400 and scanning with Adobe RGB
in The Digital Darkroom: Process, Technique & Printing
Posted
then when i open it in photoshop i get the intro message that the file does not have an embedded
profile.
hmmm