Jump to content

chris_valentine

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chris_valentine

  1. I <I>own</I> the old 300/2.8 and have <I>used</I> the IS version for ice hockey photography. I'm shooting on Fuji Superia 800 so I'm not going to notice any optical quality difference. I found the IS offputting since it takes a short but noticeable period to 'lock on' and I ended up turning it off. I <I>would</I> find IS useful, however, on the 70-200/2.8 (which I haven't yet bought) since that lens would be very useful for candids of the players without using flash.

    <P>

    Both 300s are, of course, superbly sharp and I doubt I'd personally ever see the difference in my kind of work. I will also be using mine for wildlife in conjunction with the new Mk.II version of the 2x teleconverter.

    <P>

    Chris.<BR>

    --<BR>

    <A HREF="http://www.hockeyphotos.com" TARGET="_blank">http://www.hockeyphotos.com</A>

    <BR>

    <BR>

    <BR>

    <I>In <B>sports</B> photography, subject movement is the main issue and you need fast shutter speeds to freeze the action; IS isn't going to show its advantage there. However, please keep in mind that this forum is about <B>nature photography</B>.</I><div>001PVL-4170384.jpg.dd0e3add48a2e35b9cfab411076c6497.jpg</div>

×
×
  • Create New...