whatever11664877177
-
Posts
73 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by whatever11664877177
-
-
This is the Toronto I know!
-
This is a very cool idea, and I really like the scream. However, I'm at a loss to explain *why* she is screaming. There's nothing scary about the background, and those two dudes back there are looking over like, "What's her problem?" I think this picture would be a 7/7 with a better location.
-
This is a pretty good picture, but I find it kind of flat and lacking foreground interest. I realize "flat" is probably the intent of the photographer to emphasise the mist, but I don't like the lack of detail. -
Very cool!
-
Nice details and color choice.
-
Excellent! It must have been a nice, dark location.
-
I can feel the humidity!
-
Wow... spectacular sunset colors and setting!
-
I really like this scene, with just one exception: I find the boat is too colorful for this scene. The bright blue takes away from the rest of the peaceful setting. A muddied red or something would blend in better. -
Wow... nice tones! I really like this one. It's much better than the monochrome sepia version. It really adds another dimension to the photo. -
Very nice capture of the light rays. It would be nice to see this photo from a wider angle. -
There's something about this photo that I really like, but I can't quite figure out what exactly it is. It looks rugged and wild as a black & white image. Perhaps it's just a very good composition. Nice landscape! -
It's all very nicely exposed. -
I like the perspective in this picture. It makes you feel the forest has all the power. -
Wow...! I don't often see a 7/7, but this is one. Spectacular in all regards!
-
Hanna, there should be no confusion when checking the "unmanipulated" box. It points to http://www.photo.net/photodb/manipulation.html which quite clearly states, "The image should be the result of a single exposure (shutter release) by the camera."
I think the definition covers pretty much everything.
The current use of a single box to describe "manipulated or unknown" is a good way to implement it. The author of the photo should certainly know whether it's manipulated or not, so having a separate box for "manipulated" is redundant.
-
Simple, yet very effective. Nice details. I like the way the rocky path leads you diagonally across the frame to the tree.
-
Fantastic. Works very well as a monochrome image. -
-
Yeah, David says it is not manipulated (in the details section), but frankly, I don't buy it either. Which is a shame, because it really is a great photo even if it is manipulated. I hope he just accidentally checked the unmanipulated box or something like that. (And really, what would be the point in lying about it?)
-
I like the subtle effect here. Is this a composition of an IR and a visible-light image? The trees have a natural color to them.
-
I really like the simple foreground, which doesn't detract from the great sky. The trees mimic the puffs of clouds very nicely.
-
Very nice mood in this photo, although I'm not sure the two people fit with the mood. They look happy and content, whereas the trees and fog look forboding and ominous. Perhaps a lone character would have fit the scene better? Or were you aiming for the contrast? -
Comments?
neuroshima 02
in Uncategorized
Posted