aurelia silvalis
-
Posts
27 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Image Comments posted by aurelia silvalis
-
-
Thanks. I'd be the first to admitt that I probably only put around 20 seconds of thought into the composition and I was far more worried about how the film would come out than anything else.
-
Comments? Film is Kodak Ektachrome 400, expired in 1981,
refridgerated since. Colours have been altered in PS to remove a
green cast and fogging exhibited throughout the roll. See other
photos in my roll for more details.
-
I understand that you were attempting to bring out detail on the right, but perhaps a tad overexposed on the left?
-
Constructive critiques and suggestions much appreciated.
Compare to another angle here
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2084627
This was not posed.
-
Thanks. The scanner I was using (polaroid sprintscan 35+) tended to overexpose the negatives a bit too much, so I had to do some colour correction. Oddly enough, the greens *really* were that green. Just after a month of rain, I guess. The discolouration seems to be from the circ.pol I used. A cheap thing that is now a lenscap. -
Tell me what you think.
Also have another version to be posted soon - different lens, no
trees framing.
Untitled
in Animal
Posted