Jump to content

edward_hobin

Members
  • Posts

    62
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by edward_hobin

  1. Sure focusing a view camera is more difficult and time consuming than using an autofocus 35mm SLR. On the other hand I find it easier to focus my view than I did my manual SLR just by virtue of the vastly larger screen. I think most of your hesitation must comes from the discussions of movements, which can be daughnting at first, but become second-nature in time. Besides, which is more preferable- missing the shot because you can't get the top of the building AND the fountain in the forground in focus or taking the time and effort to set up a view camera and end up with a negative that is not only in sharp focus but has better tonal seperation to boot?
  2. Ah yes, the idea of using front movements to de-emphasize certain areas is very appealing in portraiture. But the reality of getting your subject to sit still for it is something different. You could nail their head to the wall but that eliminates repeat customers.

    Perhaps others have had better luck with this than I. But anything you do to limit your depth of focus will also limit your subjects movement.

    Regards

    -ed

  3. APX 100 has been my only film for quite a while now. Knowing that B&W shooters develop a relationship with their fim Agfa could have told it's customers that they were going to discontinue sheet film. But they chose to let us find out the next time we needed to resupply.

    Personally I don't see any point in investing any time in any of Agfa's other products. Brand loyalty goes both ways.

  4. I agree with Jarrod. I use the back for perspective control- like making buildings stand up straight- and the front to control depth of field. And I always tilt the back first, to get the correct perspective, before attempting to tilt the front.
×
×
  • Create New...