darien_hewett

THANKS! I'll let him know.

I use the Canon Eos series camera so I don't know the answer to this

question, A friend of mine has an N4004 AF series Nikon Camera and

lens and would like to purchase a Nikon digital SLR body. Are his

older lenses compatiable with any of the newer digital bodies? Thanks

for any help!

Thanks for the answers, I'm brand new to 20D and I'm kind of trying a new feature a day. I should have read farther into the book, "a busy reading will be displayed for the length of the exposure" (note to self read :-)

Thanks again!

Today I got a TC-80n3 Shutter bulb so that I can do some long

exposure shots. I setup for a 8 min exposure-iso400-Noise reduction

on, after the exposure had finished I got a busy reading in my

viewfinder. I let the camera set for aprox 4min and finally I cut

the switch off, waited and turn it back on.... still "Busy" so I

pull the battery to reset. Try a 2nd time with the same results, so

then I cut noise reduction off and it worked fine clearing the

buffer quickly after exposure. Is there a problem using Noise

Reduction on long bulb settings or is there a very long processing

time for the camera to clear the buffer?

Thanks again! My original upload was under 100k and scaled 600 x 600, after it looked so bad I uploaded the huge image to see if it made a differance. I always try to keep the images to the proper sizes so that I don't hog bandwidth :-)

Thanks for the feedback, I don't have AOL but based off the answers I've gotten back it MUST be something on my end. Kind of strange, but the pictures in IE do look jaggie, I do this all on my Dell 9100 laptop which has a 16x9 format so it's probaly an issue with the browser streching the image somehow? Anyways thanks again!

I've read a little about recompressing images and I thought that was a

problem that I was having in this image

http://www.photo.net/photo/3023874 The diagonal

braces have ALOT of jaggies on them and in

http://www.photo.net/photo/3018230 the diagonal grass

blades look jaggie. I've tried several uploads at different

compression levels but I kept getting jaggies! Them I looked at this

same pictures using my secondary browser Mozilla and BAM it looks like

the original! Is there a problem with the way that "Internet Explorer"

displays photos to everyone or is there a problem in the way that I'm

processing my images? It seems like most of the photos look better in

"Mozilla"... I'm not bashing IE just wondering whats up?