Jump to content

joe_garrick

Members
  • Posts

    394
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Image Comments posted by joe_garrick

    ....

          3
    A great shot of a very striking model, but watch the crop - you've trimmed the end of her toe in the foreground. Aside from that, excellent work.
  1. I agree entirely with the previous remark about the crop. It also sppears that the horizon is slightly tipped, and I'd like to see a somewhat larger version posted in order to be able to examine the details more closely (plus I think it would be more enjoyable viewing).

     

    These are, however, relatively minor problems and easily corrected. I don't wish to sound too critical, because I do find it to be quite well done.

    Untitled

          6
    I wish the colours were more vibrant...

    To me, the colors are almost oversaturated as they are. Most of nature isn't especially vibrant, so to me this seems just about right.

    Nice effort overall.

  2. I definitely like it, but you might want to try for a better scan - I'm seeing some jpeg artifacts or something in there that's making the sand look somewhat blotchy. This could also just be the typically awful photo.net compression.

    Waterberg plateau

          4

    The dark area doesn't bother me at all, but I might have chosen a viewpoint where the branches and the plateau didn't overlap. Of course, I have no way of knowing what was there, but I'd like to see one for comparison if you shot it that way as well. This POV might also be good, but the lower branch almost disappears against the shadowed area of the cliff behind it.

     

    On balance, I still like it, but I do have a bit of a weakness for bare trees.

  3. That dark gray area.

    This appears to be a tan line. IMO, it might be better to adjust the skin tones in that area to remove the tan line for this shot.

    I'm not generally a big fan of effects, but I think this one might work well for this shot, but you seem to have stopped short in this case. I think a slightly stronger application of whatever was used might work better. Still a decent shot however, my favorite among the four currently in the folder.

  4. Interesting comments on this photo. It appears to me that the answer to the question is that she doesn't care about the sky. I don't know if I've missed something or if the other reviewers have missed something, or if it just isn't enough for them. To me, it's a decent shot.
  5. I agree with the remarks about the frame - IMO it's too much.

     

    I'm not sure what's going on with the background behind the girl.

     

    I'm afraid I don't even understand the issue with the unlevel ground and especially the girls legs - people's legs do curve at the knee, folks. If you've ever swung a kid around like this, they almost invariably bend their legs.

     

    On balance, an excellent shot.

    ...

          14
    Interesting lighting, pose, crop, and expression. I can't ask for much more than that, although I'm not sure about the hair.
  6. :-) I was rather wet after shooting a little less than one roll from this spot, but managed through luck and quick reflexes to keep the camera dry. They soaked me pretty thoroughly on this particular run.
  7. If this were a portrait, I'd say yes, it's too detached, but as a portfolio shot, maybe not.

     

    The crop at the top is bothering me a little, however. I'd want to either crop it more, or not crop the top of the head at all. Cropped this way it looks somewhat like a mistake.

×
×
  • Create New...