Jump to content

StanleyBeck

Members
  • Posts

    1,096
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by StanleyBeck

  1. <p>Lil, I don’t specialize in any particular genre of photos - I grab what I can, when I can. Sometimes they might be considered snapshots, but I keep a camera with me at all times, just so I don’t miss an opportunity. If I am going out to shoot, I bring my primary kit & tripod. At all times, I have my older DSLR & 2 lenses in my car. And when I’m, not in my car, I have my cell phone (camera of last resort - and it doesn’t attract a lot of attention). During the past couple of weeks, I have posted images to FB from all three, and nobody has spotted the difference. The point is this - don’t sit around and wish.</p>
  2. <p>Lil, I'm sorry to hear this - your photos are great. I miss seeing them. Your situation is not unique. We all go through this. I have been in photo groups, too, that just withered and died. Some members of such groups are passionate about their interest, while others have only a passing interest. I have gone through similar things during the past few years. My daughter’s family moved back to New Orleans, I had to sue my home builder over structural problems, my mother, mother-in-law and sister passed away, and now we have moved - all of this saps your time and concentration. But, I try to stay connected with my international friends on FB. Just go out and shoot, and keep in touch with your friends who still have interest. Society has to improve in a couple of years.</p>
  3. <p>Another alternative is a free, open source RAW/photo editor called LightZone. It is the best I've seen of the free applications, although it is missing some of the things that you find in other apps that you pay for. It has an extensive list of cameras that it supports. I've tried it, and have it on my computer, but I still do my editing in Photoshop CS5. Yes. it's free, and worth the price.</p>
  4. <p>I still do some sharpening, but maybe not as much as with my D200. I find that the better the lens that I am using, the less sharpening I need. Overall, some sharpening seems to help in most cases, but usually the issue is not with the sensor filter, but with operator problems (I’m still working on that).</p>
  5. <p>Just a quick test, NXD does seem to be a little smoother and faster than the Beta version I tested a few months ago, however one thing that I noticed is that converting the edited RAW file to a jpg, changing the dpi and size (in pixels) produces the worst jpg that I have ever seen. NXD cannot be used without finishing in another program, such as Photoshop.</p>
  6. <p>Never mind. (Thanks Adriano) I thought that it installed, but it didn't, and what I found on my computer was NX 2 (which I never used). Now, I can play with it, to see if this is something I really want.</p>
  7. <p>I just downloaded Nikon NX D ver 1.0.0 (or so I thought), but what got installed is NX 2 V 2.7.4 (64 bit). I don't know why it says NX 2, and I see that as a raw editor, there are are hardly any editing controls for either the RAW files or one converted to TIF. Is there something that I'm missing? It looks to me that I didn't get much for the time I invested on download and installation.</p>
  8. <p>I had been wanting a D400 ever since Nikon released the D300s (which I considered to be a D300 refresh). I purchased the D7100 when it was released, because it had just about everything I was hoping to find in a D400, and then some. All of this time I have been enjoying the features that I thought a D400 should have. Happy waiting my friends.</p>
  9. <p>@ C.P.M. van het Kaar – Thanks for your insight. That makes sense, but in this case, the fine tuning was made both times to correct for focus at the shorter end. I just find it odd that the focus point is shifting. I will probably have to send it back to Nikon for repair (or replace it if the repair cost is too high). Just wondering if others had experienced this instability.</p>
  10. <p>A couple of years ago, I had a lens that was front focusing (18-200mm), and I had to do an AF Fine Tune on it (all the way to -15 on my D7100). I hadn’t been too happy with the sharpness of my lens lately, and this morning I noticed that it was back focusing, and had to move the setting almost all the way back to the original position. Has anyone else experienced this?</p>
  11. <p>This and Adobe's security breach, like the Target issue, raises some really serious questions about what we are doing and where we are going. Many companies and software producers are trying to get everyone to do all of their work "on-line" and/or in a "cloud environment" while Internet security is the worst that it has ever been. What we are seeing is just plain system failure. Wait until we start seeing cyber warfare on an international level.</p>
  12. <p>@ Alistair: Nikon is a bit slow in bringing new things to the market. Right now, a prime of 500mm or 600mm ($$$$$), or the 80-400mm w/1.4 TC. I have an older 80 - 400mm, and money wise, this 150 - 600mm seems to be my best option.</p>
  13. <p>Thanks, Shun. I thought it was nonsense, and agree with what you say. However, since I didn't follow the thread, I was curious about how the consensus turned out. And after spending this kind of money on a camera, "careful" is my middle name.<br>

    Roberta, I'll check it out, thanks. Sure miss your photos on FB. Jeannean is back on again with some "spring break" bugs. If things work out, I may be looking for you by the Spillway before too long. :-)</p>

×
×
  • Create New...